Laserfiche WebLink
respondents to the survey mentioned co~tructmg an indoor fishing p~er hut on Lake Crook <br />favor the idea only if the city hires a full-time caretaker for the property. <br />3.3.2 VFhat about golf?. Several participants mentioned go[fas a possible use of Lake Crook <br />lands. While economic development grants and Texas Parks and Wildlife grants could be used <br />to partially fund golf courses, such courses after they are built must be self supporting. A golf <br />course with modest club house costs bet~veen $3.0 million and $4.0 million. Industry pundits say <br />36,000 rounds of golf per year are necessary to support such a course. If the city were to elect <br />to build a course there is certainly enough land on which to do it. Only about 200 acres or so is <br />needed for a quality golf course, the terrain is excellent and there is certainly abundant supply o.f <br />water. An 18-hole golf course needs about 1 million gallons of water per day during grown-m <br />and about ha[f that much during the growing season upon reaching maturity. <br /> Alternatively, ifa public course is not built, most developer-experts agree that 1,000 acres of well <br /> planned subdivision will usually support a go[f course through the homeowners' dues, trail use <br /> fees, guest fees and enhanced lot sales prices. It is commonly considered the best of all worlds <br /> to intertwine the golf course routing plan with the subdivision plan to take advantage of fairway <br /> lots, green lots and tee box lots as well as lakefi'ont and lakeview lots. In the present north shore <br /> property, to install a golf course would largely destroy the potential for home building and vice <br /> versa. The shape of the property with its numerous corners and narrows, would result in an <br /> inefficiency for high lot counts. Therefore, in order to get 1,000 acres on the north shore, an <br /> enterprising developer would have to acquire some of the adjacent, privately owned land. <br /> It is beyond the scope of this study to analyze the development of private golf courses. In these <br /> days ofprivatlzation, we are seeing more courses being taken out of the public domain than are <br /> being built into it. There are companies that specialize in nothing but golf course feasibility <br /> studies. While there may be some study out there, we have yet to see a study done where the golf <br /> course was not proven 'feasible'. We choose to believe, however, golf course ownership is not <br /> a business the City of Paris should get into. <br /> <br />Page 29 of 45 <br /> <br /> <br />