Laserfiche WebLink
0.5% as a good faith statement to our citizens. The total current tax rate is $0.52 per $100 of <br />assessed valuation. I am actually recommending a total ad valorem tax rate of $.51107, a <br />reduction of 1.717%, three times the amount targeted. Such reductions are not something we can <br />do every year, however. Some of what was required to reach that figure are one-time fixes, for <br />example. But we do take the tax rate extremely seriously and hope to prove ourselves good <br />stewards of public funds. <br />GENERAL FUND <br />Revenues: <br />Please keep in mind that cities in Texas actually adopt and maintain two different tax rates. The <br />maintenance and operations (M&O) tax rate is that portion of the total tax rate that supports the <br />operations of the city. All of this revenue goes into the General Fund. We are proposing an <br />M&O rate of $0.41487. This is a slight increase in the M&O rate from 2011-12, but is necessary <br />to fund our $103,695 payment to SuRRMA for their debt obligations related to the expansion of <br />SH 24. This figure equates to $0.0073 cents from the M&O rate not available for operating <br />costs, making our true M&O rate $.040757, or a decrease of 0.593%. <br />Another major recommended General Fund revenue change is Water Sewer Utility (gross <br />receipts) and Water & Sewer Transfer (indirect costs). Like most cities with multiple funds, <br />Paris classifies certain funds as enterprise funds, one of which is the Utilities Fund. Enterprise <br />Funds are intended to operate like a business, paying their own ways through their own revenue <br />sources, typically user fees. In order to treat our Utility Fund as an enterprise, it must assume <br />certain business expenses, such as overhead, administration, HR, risk management, auditing, <br />management, etc., plus the payment of gross receipt taxes. Leaving these kinds of costs out <br />understates the true cost of providing water and sewer services, and that in turn would mean <br />property and sales taxes are subsidizing water and sewer. In the proposed new budget I have <br />increased the gross receipts payment to 5%, thereby making that payment equivalent to fees paid <br />by other utility providers that operate within the city's rights-of-way. This should generate an <br />additional approximately $260,000 over the existing 3% rate. I am also recommending <br />increasing the indirect costs charged to the Utilities Fund by the General Fund by $125,000. <br />Expenditures: <br />• The administration budget is up by 51.27% due to the funding of the city manager's <br />position for a full year following an extended vacancy, and also because the huinan <br />resources manager's costs have been transferred from accounting to administration. This in <br />turn is a result of a reorganization that will administratively move HR to directly under the <br />city manager effective October 1. <br />• Accounting/auditing is down by almost $91,000, or 17%, due to the transfer out of HR <br />functions, and because of expenditures for one-time building improvements in 2011-12. <br />