My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05&06 Chapman Zoning
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
09 - September
>
September 06, 2001
>
05&06 Chapman Zoning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:24:46 AM
Creation date
9/5/2001 3:10:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
5 and 6
AGENDA - Type
ZONING ORDINANCE
Description
Chapman
AGENDA - Date
9/6/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AFFIDAVIT REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1710 <br />STATE OF TEXAS ] <br />COUNTY 10F LAMAR | <br /> <br /> BEFDRE ME, U~e undersigned authority, on UHs day personally appeared <br /> JEROME CEI~LP[VL~ , who Upon oath deposes and says: <br /> <br /> I'I am JEROME CHAPMAN , and lay address is <br /> PHONE NUMBER 784-4&14 <br /> 1811 PINE BLUFF and I huve a proprieta'Fy interest <br />in property located within tho corporate limits of Um City of Paris being <br />described as follows: <br /> LOT 1 OI~ RLOCK 2:27 <br /> 1707 PINE BLUFF <br /> <br /> "My interest in the above described property is OWNER <br /> <br />and I do request a change in zoning from no F.aJ~IiLY DWELLING <br /> <br />District to NEIGHBORHOOD SERYICE (NS} District. <br /> "In support of said request I make tile Fallowing answers to questions 1-4: <br /> <br /> I. Will the re-zoning be In accordance wIU~ Urn'original comprehensive <br />zoning scbeme, as represented by the pre-establt'shed zoning ordi)~ance ~nd the <br />long range mas~er plan .and map that bas been adop~ed by the zoning ordinance? <br /> <br /> 2. Will the re-zoned designation be compatible with tl,e classification and <br />uso of adjoining lands sq as to avoid adverse impact on neighbors? <br /> <br /> 3. Is the tract unsuitable for uses pemltted under Lhe present zoninr$ class- <br />if{cation; Umcefore Justifying a change in'zoning?. NO <br /> <br />· 4. Dues the re-zoning bear a substanMal rela'tionsblp to tho public health, <br />safety, morals or general wel fare or protect and preserv~ historical and cultural <br />places and areas or meet a substantial public need? YES <br /> <br />· 5, BAS A ~QPY' pE TBE CAND DEED BEEN'SUBHITT/F~D? YES ~ <br /> <br /> ~,Ygnature of AppPFqant <br /> <br /> SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, b~ the said . JEROME CIL~pM~6.N <br />this 20 day of JULY. , ~0 0~ · <br /> <br />F [ LED~: C-~ ~c~l <br /> <br /> ttJe gunnFngl~am, glCy ~lerK ~ ' ' ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.