Laserfiche WebLink
EXPLANATION OF ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE RECONCILIATION OF THE MUNICIPAL <br /> <br />CONTRIBUTION RATE FOR 2002 WITH THAT OF 2001 <br /> <br />NORMAL COST CONTRIBUTION RATE RECONCILIATION <br /> <br />'1. CHANGE DUE TO TERMINATION OF STATUS AS A CONTRIBUTING MEMBER: <br /> <br />This item reflects changes due to termination of status as a contributing member that may result from death, <br />termination of employment, disability, or retirement. When a member stops contributing to TMRS, the city's cost for <br />matching deposits ends, and the employee's salary is removed from the total payroll used to fund all benefits. Unless <br />another employee flits the vacated position, this will normally cause an increase in the contribution rate. <br /> <br />2. CHANGES IN SERVICE AND SALARY CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS: <br /> <br />The first portion of this category shows changes in the number of contributing members. An increase in the number of <br />contributing members (new positions) from one year to the next increases the overall payroll used to fund retirement <br />benefits. Although a city's matching funds will increase due to the new employees, the aggregate effect of increasing <br />the number of contributing members usually is a decrease in a city's contribution rate. <br /> <br />The second part of this category is change of compensation. When a member's compensation changes from one <br />actuarial valuation to another, the city's matching requirements likewise change. The combined effect of these <br />changes can either be an increase or a decrease in the city's contribution rate. <br /> <br />3. CHANGE DUE TO INCREASED AGE OF CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS: <br /> <br />As the age of contributing members increases, the probability of the member remaining employed until retirement also <br />increases. Increasing age of the members therefore increases the likelihood that a member will reach retirement <br />eligibility and retire, resulting in an increase in the city's contribution rate. <br /> <br />4. INCREASE DUE TO PHASE-IN OF ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTION CHANGES: <br /> <br />For eligible cities that chose to phase-in the effect of changes in actuarial assumptions resulting from the 5-year <br />experience study completed in 1998, this amount is an increase in the calculated rate. The 2001 rate took into <br />account 40% of the effect of the assumption changes. The 2002 rate takes into account 60% of the effect; thus the <br />2002 rate acknowledges an additional 20% of the rate increase caused by changes in the actuarial assumptions. <br /> <br />5. CHANGE DUE TO 5-YEAR VESTING: <br /> <br />The Texas Legislature adopted a provision whereby all cities participating in TMRS will be covered by a 5-Year <br />Vesting provision unless a city elects to remain at 10-Year Vesting. For most cities, the effect of this change is an <br />increase in the normal cost rate. <br /> <br />CONSERVATIVE FUNDING AND OTHER FACTORS: <br /> <br />For cities with fewer than three contributing members, conservative funding formulas are used to calculate the normal <br />cost contribution rate. These conservative funding formulas ensure that the city matching portion is fully funded at the <br />time of retirement. <br />Also included in this category are adjustments for other actuarial factors. This is usually just the effect of rounding in <br />the actuarial valuation process. <br /> <br />PRIOR SERVICE CONTRIBUTION RATE RECONCILIATION <br />1, CHANGE DUE TO ANNUALLY REPEATING UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS AND ANNUITY INCREASES: <br /> For a city that has adopted annually repeating Updated Service Credits, this is the effect of additional actuarial liability <br /> derived from the new credits to be granted effective January 1 of the year in which the rate is effective. Likewise, if the <br /> city has adopted annually repeating Annuity Increases, this is the effect of the additional actuarial liability derived from <br /> the annuity increases to be granted. <br /> <br /> <br />