My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-C-1&2 Kammer Abatement Req
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
11 - November
>
November 12, 2001
>
03-C-1&2 Kammer Abatement Req
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:20:51 AM
Creation date
11/1/2001 4:11:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
3-C (1) and (2)
AGENDA - Type
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
Description
Kenny Kammer - Request Tax Abatement
AGENDA - Date
11/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Property Description and Zoning <br /> <br />The overall site including the closed alley contained approximately 68,460 SF and had 210' of <br />frontage on Bonham and Maple and 326' of depth according to the city plat. Both streets were two <br />lane, asphalt surfaced with concrete curb and gutter. There may have been some typical utility <br />easements along the streets. It was at street grade on both sides but sloped very gently to the north <br />with most of the run off in that direction. None of the property was in the 100 year flood plain. It was <br />almost entirely open but had a few large trees. <br /> <br />The subject was zoned General Retail which allows a wide variety of uses including all the lesser <br />classifications of office, neighborhood service, and multi family. There is 20' front back but no <br />specific side or set back requirements except that a gasoline pump must be at least 12' off the <br />property line. It had a 40% lot coverage ratio. The general parking requirements are one space per <br />400 square feet of floor area for offices and one space per 200 square feet for retail and personal <br />service uses. It is one of the most unrestrictive classifications available and should satisfy most <br />feasible uses for the subject. <br /> <br />The dwellings at 1726 Bonham and 1735 Maple were beyond feasible repair. A 28.2' x 28.2' frame <br />dwelling at 1749 Maple was liveable with some minor repairs. It was probably 50 years old and had <br />four rooms, two bedrooms, and a single bath, 6' x 6', added to a rear corner. Its wood siding needed <br />paint, the shingled roof needed recovering and the interior finish needed updating but it appeared to <br />be sound enough to withstand a move to another site. The dwelling just west at 1753 Maple was <br />exactly the same except that it measured 28.2 x 30.2 and had its single bath inside the main <br />perimeter. There was also an old detached garage between the two that had no value. There is a <br />demand for these small dwellings to be moved to other sites but overall, they added nothing to the <br />value of the land as now zoned. The possible salvage value of $1,000 to $2,000 per house should just <br />about offset the cost of razing the other two dwellings. <br /> <br />Ad Valorem Tax Data <br /> <br />Presently, the subject was assessed in three accounts. The total land was assessed at $30,080 with <br />unit assessments ranging from $0.53 PSF for the vacant land on Bonham to $0.43 PSF for the lots <br />as residential tracts. The smaller commercial zoned tract at 1704 Bonham was assessed at $0.75 PSF <br />and the 53,350 SF site across the street under the Hick's Muffler and Tire Shop was assessed at <br />$0.73 PSF. The present improvements were assessed at $11,360. Thus, the total assessment was only <br />$41,440 and the real estate taxes for 2000 were $1,102. <br /> <br />Next year, the improvements should be dropped and the land raised to reflect the zoning change. <br />This the land assessment was estimated at $0.75 PSF or $51,345 which is very closer to market. <br />The 2002 rate was estimated to be 4% higher or $2.77 for a total tax burden of $1,420. <br /> <br />The tax assessments are based on mass appraisal techniques and are not necessarily indicative of <br />market value and do not effect sales prices. <br /> <br />PAT MURPHY & ASSOCIATES 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.