My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13-APPROVAL OF VENDOR REGARDING PREPARATION OF TEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2012
>
11 November
>
11.12.12
>
13-APPROVAL OF VENDOR REGARDING PREPARATION OF TEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2012 3:07:00 PM
Creation date
11/9/2012 3:07:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Submittal Date: <br />11/OS/2012 <br />Council Date: <br />11/12/2012 <br />CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING SHEET <br />Originating Department: � Presented By: <br />City Manager � John Uodwin <br />RECOMMENDED MOTION: <br />Approval of Vendor <br />PoL�CY ISSUE(s): <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Agenda Item No.: <br />13. <br />Three engineering firms made presentations to the city council at a special meeting on Monday, October <br />15, regarding preparation of a ten-year capital Improvements Plan. I believe any of the three firms is <br />capable of completing the work, and doing so quite well. We intentionally identified firms of different <br />sizes and structure, from the very large national Freese & Nichols, to the medium-sized regional KSA, <br />to the small local Hayter Engineering. Freese & Nichols would likely be the slowest, with the longest <br />learning curve and the highest costs. They have suggested they can complete the work in about twelve <br />months, working out of their Fort Worth office. KSA would have somewhat less of a learning curve, <br />and they have suggested using three different offices (Longview, Tyler, and Austin) simultaneously so <br />as to reduce the overall project timeline to about six months from the expected twelve. Hayter has the <br />clear advantage of knowing the city and our staff quite well, so would initially be able to move much <br />faster with less duplication. They have a noticeably smaller staff of their own, however, so would <br />perhaps be slower as the project moved forward, and they have less experience at this type and sized <br />project. <br />BOARD�COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: <br />EXHIBITS: <br />ACTION: <br />❑ Financial Report <br />❑ Department Report <br />❑ Presentation <br />❑ Public Hearing <br />FiscAL NoTES: <br />� Minute Order <br />❑ Resolution <br />❑ Ordinance <br />❑ Other <br />BUDGET INFO: <br />Expense � <br />Budgeted Amt. $ <br />YTD Actual � <br />Acct. Name <br />Acct. Number <br />City of Paris �� Revised 6/20/12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.