Laserfiche WebLink
IV. SUMIYIARX <br />A. Comparison of Plant Performance from Initia] Comprehensive Performance <br />Evaluation to the Teaas Optimization Program Goals Achieved <br />Utilizing the inirial comprehensive performance evaluation u a baseline for performance, <br />comparison and evaluauon, Figure 19 illustrates the settled water turbidity frequency plot. <br />Settled water turbidity has been improved from meeting a 2.0 NN less than 25 percent <br />of the time, to meeting a 2.0 NTU 99.9 percent of the time. Figure 20 illustrates the <br />bottom line resulu for finished water turbidiry frequency plot. The plant performance <br />increased from achieving a 0.1 NN appro;cimately less than 5 percent of the time to <br />achieve a 0.1 NN over 100 percent of the rime. <br />Figure 20: Finished Water Turbidity Performance <br />1 <br />Fioure 19: Settled Water Turbidity Performance <br />