My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02 P&Z Report
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2002
>
10 - October
>
2002-10-10
>
02 P&Z Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:19:57 AM
Creation date
10/4/2002 7:38:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
2
AGENDA - Type
REPORT
Description
Planning & Zoning Commission
AGENDA - Date
10/7/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br /> 1. <br /> <br />MEMO <br /> <br />PLANNING AND ZONING AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS <br /> <br />STEVE METI4VEN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS TO OGTOBER 7,2002 P&Z & CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />MONTE MOORE IS REQUESTING COMMERCIAL ZONING ON THIS LOT <br />LOCATED IN THE 3300 BLOCK OF CENTER STREET. MR. MOORE <br />WANTS TO TIE THISPROPERTY TO THE EXISTING PROPERTY HE <br />OWNS TO THE SOUTH KNOWN AS PARIS BUSINESS PARK. MR. <br />MOORE IS SEEKING COMMERCIAL TO-MATCH THE REST OF THE <br />PROPERTY AND I WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL. <br /> <br />DAVID MCLA~IN IS SEEKING NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ZONING <br />ON THIS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 206 S.E. 24TM. MIL MCLAUGHLIN <br />PLANS TO BUtLDA NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND t-tlS WIFE <br />DOES ALTERATION WORK AND NEEDS A PLACE FOR HER BUSINESS. <br />THE CITY OF PARIS ZONING ORDINANCE ALLOWS THIS USE WITH <br />THIS ZONING AND IF THERE WERE NO OPPOSITION I WOULD <br />RECOMMEND APPROVAL. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />DONNA SWINDLE IS REQUESTING NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE <br />ZONING ON THIS LOT LOCATED AT 664 S.E. 22~'D. TI-IlS PETITION WAS <br />PRESENTED BACK IN JULY AND WAS TURNED DOWN. MS. SWINDLE <br />PLANS TO BUILD A BEAUTY SHOP THERE AND WOULD LIKE TO TRY <br />THIS PETITION AGAIN. THERE WAS SOME OPPOSITION TO THIS <br />CHANGE IN JULY AND I WOULD ASSUME THERE WILL BE SOME <br />MORE THIS MONTH. IF THERE WERE OPPOSITION I WOULD <br />RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE PETITION. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.