Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting <br />Aug. 12. 2002 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />said that he provided the county with a copy of the invoice where the city paid <br />for the actual truck, which was $229,449.00. The city has never charged the <br />county with any supplies or maintenance that has to go on the rescue truck, all <br />of that is absorbed in the Fire Department's budget. Councilwoman Neeley <br />stated that the city bought the equipment that is on the rescue truck and that is <br />at the city's expense. Mr. Anderson said yes the city purchased the truck out <br />of Certificate of Obligation funds which the city paid just over 5% interest rate <br />on. Because the truck has an expected life of over 20 years or longer, they just <br />amortized the $229,449.00 at 5% for 20 years and that comes up to $18,180.00 <br />a year, and he rolls that $18,180.00 into the total cost. He said they provided <br />the county documentation on how they did that. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated that another thing that the county asked about persistently <br />was the administrative overhead at 6.5% and whether or not that is a fair and <br />reasonable number. He provided the county with two examples. One was the <br />Women, Infant and Children program that is operated at the Health Department <br />that is a State funded program and they allowed an administrative cost to be <br />paid to the city because the city does the administrative work for this program. <br />He keeps the books, pays the bills, and processes the payroll. If there is a legal <br />issue, then City Attorney Schenk handles the legal matters, and the State allows <br />under that 10% of the direct salary cost for the administrative overhead. Mr. <br />Anderson said if you take 10% of the direct salary cost for administrative <br />overhead factor and put it in the EMS contract, the city would draw more <br />money using that standard than we do 6.5%. Mr. Anderson said the other <br />example he gave the county was one of the first contracts that he had anything <br />to do with when he came to work for the city. In 1985, the city was negotiating <br />a wastewater treatment contract with Merico, and in that agreement with them, <br />the city negotiated an administrative overhead as 6.5%. Mr. Anderson felt that <br />both of the examples showed the reason for the 6.5% that the city adds on for <br />this cost. That it was not just a number pulled out of the air, but it is a <br />reasonable number. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Manning asked Mr. Klinkerman to explain why we run the <br />rescue truck every time they call. <br /> <br /> <br />