Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting <br />November 11, 2002 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />would have to be available and ready for dispatch within twelve hours. He said <br />that contradicts the FAA Rules and Regulations that he is regulated by. Mr. <br />Jones advised that there are times that he is required to have a fourteen-hour rest <br />period before he is available for dispatch. Also, with having only one aircraft <br />and one pilot, if he is on a trip, he may be gone for two to three days and it would <br />be impossible for him to be available for dispatch within the confines of the <br />twelve-hour notice. For these reasons, Mr. Jones requested that these <br />requirements to waived. <br /> <br />City Attorney Schenk advised the City Council that he has talked to Tommy <br />Haynes and Mr. Collier, and explained that these ordinances have historical <br />significance, and advised that there are no provisions for waiver under the <br />ordinance but Sec 6-22(d) does not have a practical application any more and he <br />felt that came up when an older fire vehicle was located at the airport, and that <br />is no longer the practice. City Attorney Schenk said that next month is when the <br />city will be doing the renewal on all of the permits for operation off of the <br />airport. City Attorney Schenk said he would like to come back and amend the <br />Code of Ordinances by removing the requirements that are no longer needed. <br />Mr. Schenk felt that the same is true with regard to the twelve-hour requirement <br />for dispatch. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones said he would like something in writing because failure to comply with <br />these requirements makes him subject to a misdemeanor and he would not want <br />that on his record. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones said the third item for clarification is for him to name the City of Paris <br />as a coinsured on his insurance policy even though he does not have facilities at <br />the Paris Airport. <br /> <br />City Attorney Schenk advised that this is a requirement of all permittees, and it <br />is not directly associated with physical facilities at the airport. He stated that if <br />there is any occurrence that would in any way subject the city to some type of <br />liability claim as a result of his operation whether it is based in a structure or not <br />in a structure, the city expects to be insured from any sort of liability that could <br /> <br /> <br />