My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-G-3-b City Attorney Agmt
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
02 - February
>
2003-02-10
>
03-G-3-b City Attorney Agmt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:25:28 AM
Creation date
2/6/2003 11:10:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
3G
AGENDA - Type
REPORT
Description
City Attorney Professional Services Agreement
AGENDA - Date
2/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive Being Evaluated: <br />Evaluator: <br />Evaluation Date: <br /> <br />City Attorney Larry W. Schenk <br /> <br />INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVES <br /> <br />BY CITY OF PARIS CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />Use the following guidelines to evaluate employee's performance for each specific <br />responsibility or criteria listed on the Executive Evaluation Sheet: <br /> <br />Exceeds Requirements: Performance is well above the normal standards for this <br />position. Score with a numerical score of 4. <br /> <br />Satisfactorily Meets Requirements: Employee consistently demonstrates competent <br />performance in the specific job responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of <br />3. <br /> <br />Requires Improvement: Performance periodically or regularly falls short of normal <br />standards. The evaluation indicates the evaluator's belief the employee can and will make <br />necessary improvements in this performance category. Score with a numerical score of <br />2. <br /> <br />Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly inadequate. Employee has demonstrated an <br />inability or unwillingness to improve or to meet standard performance levels. Score with <br />a numerical score of 1. <br /> <br />Evaluation forms should be completed by each individual Council Person, following careful <br />individual consideration, and before the formal evaluation meeting, without collaboration <br />with other Council Persons in any way. <br /> <br />After the Executive Evaluation Sheet is completed by each Council Person the <br />Performance Evaluation Overview must be completed to determine the composite average <br />in each performance category and the overall Average Composite Evaluation Rating. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A to City Attorney's <br />Professional Services Agreement <br />Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.