12-G Evaluation Instrument - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Executive Being Evaluated: Evaluator: Evaluation Date: City Attorney INSTRUCTIONS FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVES BY CITY OF PARIS CITY COUNCIL Use the following guidelines to evaluate employee's performance for each performance category listed on the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet: Exceeds Requirements: Performance is well above the normal standards for this position. Score with a numerical score of 4. Satisfactorily Meets Requirements: Employee consistently demonstrates competent performance in the specific job responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of 3. Requires Improvement: Performance periodically or regularly falls short of normal standards. The evaluation indicates the evaluator's belief the employee can and will make necessary improvements in this performance category. Score with a numerical score of 2. Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly inadequate. Employee has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to improve or to meet standard performance levels. Score with a numerical score of 1. Evaluation forms should be completed by each individual Council Person, following careful individual consideration, and before the formal evaluation meeting, without collaboration with other Council Persons in any way. In the event an evaluation of 2 or less is ,qiven in any specific performance category, the evaluator must indicate by comments in the lines followin,q that criteria specific instances justifying the Iow evaluation and su,q,qested actions to improve the evaluation. After the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet is completed by each Council Person the Performance Evaluation Overview must be completed to determine the composite average in each performance category and the overall Average Composite Evaluation Rating. EXHIBIT B Pa~e I of 4