Laserfiche WebLink
~ RULE #16 - RADIOLOGY UNBUNDLED Whenever more than one physician <br /> is hilling for the same radiology episode, the physicians are paid according to the <br /> correct component of the radiology service. <br /> <br />YES NO <br />~ [~ RULE #17, MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE PROCEDURES <br /> Whenever a physician bills for "mutually exclusive" procedures (can not be <br /> performed during the same operative episode). The procedure of the highest value <br /> is paid, the remaining procedure(s) are denied. <br /> <br /> ~ RULE #18 - POST-OP CARE, RULE#19~ PRE-OP CARE <br /> Whenever a physician is billing for care before or after a procedure that another <br /> physician has perfon'ned, and if the care is within the global fee period of the <br /> procedure and for a related condition, it will be denied. <br /> <br />I-ri I'-1 RULE #20- MEDICAL PROTOCOL <br /> Whenever a physician bills for a procedure more frequently than is justified by the <br /> condition of the patient, it will pend for Utilization Review. <br /> <br /> [-'-] RULE #21-FRAGMENTED PROCEDURES <br /> Whenever a physician bills for multiple procedures on the same date of service <br /> (DOS) that are components of a major procedure for which there is a unique <br /> procedure code, the procedures are rebundled into the appropriate major <br /> procedure code. <br /> <br /> ]'--"l RULE #22 - SECONDARY PROCEDURE MANAGEMENT <br /> Whenever a physician bills for multiple procedures, all of which qualify for <br /> payment, the procedure of highest value is paid in full. The remaining second <br /> procedures are reduced to the specified amount allowed for that procedure, all <br /> other procedures are denied. <br /> <br /> ['~ RULE #23 - BILATERAL PROCEDURE MANAGEMENT <br /> Whenever a physician bills for a bilateral procedure, the payment is reduced to not <br /> exceed the n~aximum allowed for that procedure. <br /> <br /> 1~ RULE #24- UTILIZATION REVIEW <br /> Whenever a physician bills for certain procedures that usually signify upcoding, <br /> are of questionable appropriateness, or are inherently vague, and the patient's <br /> condition does not warrant it, it will pend for Utilization Review. <br /> <br /> <br />