My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-F Water/Sewer (4/22/03)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
06 - June
>
2003-06-09
>
03-F Water/Sewer (4/22/03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:24:25 AM
Creation date
6/6/2003 6:54:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
3-F
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council Water and Sewer Subcommittee
AGENDA - Date
4/22/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water and Sewer Subcommittee <br />April 22, 2003 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />them a successful partnership. First and foremost, the city needs to have the <br />consensus among the city's decision makers that this is what the city wants to <br />do. That is why they are here tonight is to make this presentation and answer the <br />Committee Members questions. Then the city will define what policy and <br />process they will follow as the city moves forward with this. The City would <br />need to focus on quality of service at a responsible price, and not necessarily the <br />lowest price that someone could offer you. They want to share responsibility and <br />risk and reward and define the scope of the city's projects. Ms. Ross said the <br />city will have to make the decision if they are looking at water or wastewater <br />treatment, whether they want them to take a look at the distribution and <br />collection system. The City of Paris will define the scope and tell them what to <br />look at, and define for them the cost that it is costing the city to do those services <br />right now so they will have a benchmark to go by. Ms. Ross also said the city <br />should go into this with a partnership type of approach and it will be a successful <br />procurement. <br /> <br />Chairman Plata asked Ms. Ross if they were able to save Temple, Texas, any <br />money. Mr. Gregg Higgins advised Chairman Plata that they were able to save <br />Temple money, and on the second renewal that their cost was reduced. Ms. Ross <br />said they were able to offer their clients from 10% to 30% savings for the current <br />or the same amount of services that they are receiving right now. Sometimes <br />when cities go through procurement, they may add services and ask for <br />additional services. She said that in some cases, it is hard to compare their <br />savings, but usually it is from 10% to 30%. Ms. Ross also stated they would be <br />responsible for the maintenance of the facilities. Mr. Higgins did advise that <br />there are some facilities that all they do is maintain the equipment for that <br />facility, and in other cases, they do everything. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Neeley asked what happens when a mandate comes down while <br />OMI is managing a facility. Ms. Ross advised that would be an increase in the <br />scope of their contract. They would do research and go over exactly what those <br />increases in regulations would mean. Sometimes the direct costs, such as <br />chemical or energy, would go up to accomplish an expanded level of treatment. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.