My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-A TXU Gas Rate Inc. Request
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
07 - July
>
2003-07-14
>
05-A TXU Gas Rate Inc. Request
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:21:12 AM
Creation date
7/10/2003 7:42:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
5-A
AGENDA - Type
ORDINANCE
Description
Deny TXU Request for Rate Increase
AGENDA - Date
7/14/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There is another group of cities, referred to as Association of TXU Municipalities <br />(ATM), represented by Jim Boyle and Monte Akers, involved in the RRC proceeding. ATM has <br />46 members, mostly small cities. The number of residents of ATM cities is about 9% of total <br />customers and they consume about 6% of the gas sold on the system. <br /> <br /> During the period of time that cities were considering whether to deny or suspend TXU's <br />application, my office negotiated concessions from TXU regarding development of a procedural <br />schedule for RRC proceedings. As this statewide case is the flint of its kind with many <br />controversial and difficult issues, it is unlikely that Cities' case could be thoroughly developed <br />within the traditional 185 day time frame. We successfully negotiated an agreement from the <br />Company to extend the Commission jurisdiction from 185 days to 300 days; in return, ACC <br />agreed that the Cities would expedite the process of getting RRC jurisdiction over city action by <br />expediting denials that could be appealed. Having worked out that agreement with TXU, it is <br />now appropriate for the members of the coalition that I represent to pass ordinances denying the <br />Company's application. I have revised the denial ordinance TXU previously asked you to pass. <br />It is attached to this memo and should be placed before your council at the earliest convenient <br />time. <br /> <br /> I had several Steering Committee members ask that I include findings of fact to justify <br />denial. The Steering Committee then directed that such findings be included with this package. <br />I have included a list of proposed f'mdings which are also reflected in the ordinance. I have <br />carefully structured the findings to address generic issues so that we can avoid premature release <br />of issues being pursued by your consultants. <br /> <br /> Your consultants were selected to tap the strengths of several different firms. A three- <br />phased approach is being used to develop your positions. Phase 1 was used to evaluate issues <br />and potential consultants. Phase 2 is the discovery and development phase that we are in <br />currently. A six-hour meeting was held in my office on July 1st with the various consultants to <br />share ideas and issues. Phase 2 will continue through the end of August. Phase 3 will focus on <br />development of testimony and re-evaluation of preliminary decisions as to who should testify. <br />Your consultants and witnesses consist of several members from R.J. Covington Consulting, <br />Steve Hill (on rate of return), Steve Andersen (on class cost allocation and rate design), Connie <br />Cannady and 4MP, consisting of former TXU employees. <br /> <br /> The first preheating conference at the RRC in GUD No. 9400 will occur on Monday, <br />July 14, 2003. <br /> <br />1668\09~9400~mmoO30703gmg <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.