Laserfiche WebLink
LLOYD, GOSSELINK, BLEVINS, ROCHELLE, <br /> BALDWIN & TOWNSEND, P.C. <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> <br /> 111 CONGRESS AVENUE TELEPHONE (512) 322-5800 <br /> SUITE 1800 Mr. Cray's Dir~'tLine: (512)322-5875 TELECOPIER (512)472-0532 <br /> AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Email: g~ay~lglawfim].com www. lalawflrm.com <br /> <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: CAPP Members <br />FROM: Geoffrey M. Gay <br />DATE: September 5, 2003 <br />RE: Electric Franchise Fees For 2002 <br /> <br /> Cities that recently received franchise fee payments in August for electric <br />consumption in 2002 may have noticed a decline in value in comparison to comparable <br />payment in 2001. Many cities may experience significant (double digit percentage) lost <br />revenue. The primary causes for decreased fee payments are: first, a 1999 legislative <br />change to a formulaic approach that became effective January 1, 2002 and second, <br />2001 was an extraordinary year for utility revenues because of high fuel costs and <br />surcharges of previously under-recovered fuel costs. It is important to note that the <br />selection of a particular retail provider over other potential providers plays no role in the <br />calculation or payment of franchise fees. In other words, the franchise fee payments to <br />CAPP member cities during 2003 for consumption within municipal limits during 2002 is <br />not influenced by CAPP's choice of provider. Your city's franchise fee recovery would <br />be the same irrespective of whether CAPP contracted with First Choice Power, TXU, <br />Reliant, or any other retail electric provider that serves the Texas market. <br /> <br /> PUPA Section 33.008 now requires that franchise fees be based upon a factor <br />(that will vary by city) multiplied by the total sales (kWh) within municipal limits. The <br />factor is the ratio of kWh consumption within a city during 1998 and the franchise fees <br />paid on those 1998 sales (factor = 1998 fees/1998 kWh). Thus, current franchise fees <br />are not sensitive to changes in the price of electricity. Furthermore, it is the incumbent <br />transmission and distribution or "wires" company that is responsible for paying franchise <br />fees as a rental on the use of public rights-of-way. The franchise fees are recovered by <br />the wires company as part of the non-bypassable rates set by the Public Utility <br />Commission. <br /> <br /> CAPP's legislative agenda during the most recent regular legislative session <br />included a bill to add an inflation adjustment to the statutory language on how electric <br />franchise fees are to be calculated. The bill did not get out of committee. This issue will <br />likely remain on CAPP's legislative agenda until the law is changed. <br /> <br />1813\00~mac~mmo030905gmg <br /> <br /> <br />