My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09 City Council (7/28/2003)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
10 - October
>
2003-10-13
>
09 City Council (7/28/2003)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 8:19:02 AM
Creation date
10/10/2003 9:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
9
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council
AGENDA - Date
7/28/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />July 28 , 2003 <br />Page 8 <br />Anderson said he had not checked that. Mr. Anderson reminded the City <br />Council that is a real number, but it can be misleading if you do not know what <br />the associated taxable value is. He said that someone that has a taxable value <br />that is significantly more than the City of Paris can raise more money on a <br />lower tax rate. You have to consider the rate and the taxable value together to <br />get a true picture. <br />Mayor Fendley called for a report from Kent Klinkerman, Director of the EMS, <br />regarding projected cost of the ambulance contract with Lamar County for <br />2003-2004. <br />Mr. Klinkerman came forward giving the City Council a handout containing <br />figures for the EMS Contract estimate for the year ending September 30, 2004. <br />Mr. Klinkerman said, as the City Council could see by his handout, the <br />personnel cost is a combined cost of the EMS, Dispatchers, and Rescue <br />personnel. The balance of the categories applies to the technical equipment, <br />medical expense, audit and capital equipment comes straight from the EMS <br />budget for a subtotal of $2,204,131.00. He said there is a 6.5% Administrative <br />Fee of $143,269.00 for another subtotal of $2,347,400.00. Mr. Klinkerman <br />said they were projecting collections of $1,600,000.00 with a net cost of <br />$747,400.00 and 40%, of that was for Lamar County's share of the net cost <br />which would be $298,960.00, or $24,913.00 per month. <br />Mr. Klinkerman directed Council's attention to the second page, which is the <br />history of the contract for the past 13 years, noting that historically they <br />typically bring in more revenue than what the proj ection is; thereby, upon the <br />settle-up, they rebate back to the county. <br />There being no further business, a motion was made by Councilman McCarthy, <br />seconded by Councilman Weekly, to adjourn. The motion carried 6 ayes, 0 <br />nays. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.