My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13 City Council (08/11/03)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
11 - November
>
2003-11-06
>
13 City Council (08/11/03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:21:04 AM
Creation date
11/7/2003 6:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
13
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council
AGENDA - Date
8/11/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />August 11,2003 <br />Page 23 <br /> <br />what staff is saying is, if you have a non-binding estimate and they say they <br />can get it done in three days by Mr. Napier's estimate, their estimate is <br />academic because each contractor can tell that he can get it done in the least <br />number of days, so you will give him the work. The City Attorney said that <br />is why he thinks the better estimate from the city's perspective, whether it <br />winds up being that or not, is our own engineer. He was not saying it has to <br />hit it on the nose, but to allow the contractors to give us the estimates almost <br />invites the fact that one contractor will certainly try to under bid the next, but <br />whether you get it done on a day basis for that amount remains to be seen. <br /> <br />City Attorney Schenk asked what the City Council thinks of this: if there is an <br />emergency, we want it fixed. If it is not an emergency, then what Mr. Napier <br />can do is identify for the month or two months kinds of projects that he sees <br />that needs to be done. They can bring those to the City Council with the <br />description as to the size and nature of the projects and what they think it will <br />be, a brief description, and the cost. The question is, do you want to do these <br />separately or do you want to try to aggregate them in a single deal; or do you <br />want the city engineer to make a recommendation? <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley said he did get those comments and thoughts and they will <br />bring that back at a later date with a recommendation as to how the Council <br />wants to go forward. <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley announced that the next item on the agenda deals primarily <br />with Budget Workshop items. He said they have another budget workshop set <br />for August 14, 2003, and the Council might want to go ahead at this time and <br />schedule what departments the Council would like to look at. <br /> <br />City Manager Malone said they could take the departments in order as they are <br />in the budget, or any order the Council would prefer. <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley said the main thing he noticed when going through the <br />department budgets was talk about a payroll increase of 3.43% but even if the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.