Laserfiche WebLink
School <br />Finance and <br /> <br />TexasCities <br /> <br /> Are cities <br /> and schools <br />in Texas <br />interconnected? <br /> <br />Y~e Texas cities and school districts are <br />intemonnected in a number of ways. To a great extent, <br />cities form the environment in which schools exist. For <br />instance, cities provide the infrastructure that is used by <br />all schools within their boundaries. City services like <br />police and fire protection, utilities, parks and recreational <br />facilities, and libraries all benefit area schools. <br /> <br />Because of the close relationship that exists between the <br />two entities, legislation that harms cities can also harm <br />schools. If cities are unable to provide the necessary <br />basic services and infrastructure for their citizens, then <br />the local school districts will also suffer. If a city stag- <br />nates in its ability to prosper and grew, so too will its <br />schools. It would be unfortunate if school finance reform <br />backfires because cities are unable to provide the services <br />that help schools to thrive. <br /> <br />I; school <br />finance reform <br />harm dties? <br /> <br />Y~se A number of the options proposed for school finance <br />reform could have negative impacts on cities. Specifically, these <br />options could: <br /> <br /> Negatively affect the ability of cities to generate proper- <br />ty tax revenue. The property tax is a primary source of revenue <br />for Texas cities. Revenue from property taxes paves our city <br />streets, pays our police and firefighters, builds and maintains <br />parks, and supports many other functions. There is a danger, <br />however, that school finance reform proposals will address a per- <br />ceived need to "reform" existing property taxes, even city taxes. <br />While rising property taxes are a burden to landowners, it is crit- <br />ical that the legislature recognize that the source of the problem <br />is not, and has never been, the city property tax component of a <br />citizen's tax bill. While school district taxes have been on the rise, <br />for example, city property taxes have generally held steady. <br />Further, city property taxes as a percentage of total property tax <br />bills have shrunk compared to school, county, and special district <br />taxes. Accordingly, the Texas Legislature should resist efforts to <br />"reform" city property taxes through new caps, freezes, or other <br />artificial limitations. Current "Truth-in-Taxation Laws" are ade- <br />quate to protect taxpayers. <br /> <br /> Reduce sales tax revenue. Statewide, city sales taxes are <br /> nearly equal to property taxes as a source of city revenue. Most <br /> cities have adopted a basic one-cent city sales tax, and many <br /> cities have additional, dedicated-purpose sales taxes. Recent <br /> legislation has proposed expanding the state sales tax base to <br /> include many previously untaxed services. Rather than allowing <br /> each city to apply its sales tax rate to the expanded base, howev- <br /> er, the proposed legislation would appropriate the entire increase <br /> in both state and municipal sales tax revenue to a state education <br /> fund. This is troubling for two reasons. First, it takes from cities <br /> what should be theirs. The one-cent city sales tax should apply <br /> to the same base as the state's sales tax. Second, it will be diffi- <br /> cult, if not impossible, for the state to accurately determine the <br /> extent to which city sales tax increases are due to the expanded <br /> base and which increases are due to ordinary economic growth. <br /> As a result, city sales tax revenue can be reduced. <br /> <br /> <br />