My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08 Approve Evaluation Forms
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
03 - March
>
2004-03-08
>
08 Approve Evaluation Forms
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:25:20 AM
Creation date
3/5/2004 9:35:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
8
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Approve Evaluation Forms
AGENDA - Date
3/8/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive Being Evaluated: <br />Evaluator: <br />Evaluation Date: <br /> <br />City Manager <br /> <br />INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVES <br /> <br />BY CITY OF PARIS CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />Use the following guidelines to evaluate employee's performance for each performance category <br />listed on the Executive Evaluation Sheet: <br /> <br />Outstanding: Performance is well above the normal standards for this position. Score with a <br />numerical score of 4.5 - 5.0. <br /> <br />Very Good: Performance is usually above competent performance in the specific job <br />responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of 3.5 - 4.4. <br /> <br />Good: Employee consistently demonstrates competent performance in the specific job <br />responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of 2.5 - 3.4. <br /> <br />Below Average: Performance periodically or regularly falls short of normal standards. The <br />evaluation indicates the evaluator's belief the employee can and will make necessary <br />improvements in this performance category. Score with a numerical score of 1.5 - 2.4. <br /> <br />Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly inadequate. Employee has demonstrated an inability or <br />unwillingness to improve or to meet standard performance levels. Score with a numerical score <br />of 1.0- 1.4. <br /> <br />Evaluation forms should be completed by each individual Council Person, following careful <br />individual consideration, and before the formal evaluation meeting, without collaboration with other <br />Council Persons in any way. <br /> <br />In the event an evaluation of 2.4 or less is given in any specific performance cateqory, the <br />evaluator must indicate by comments in the lines followinq that criteria specific instances iustifyin,q <br />the Iow evaluation and suq,qested actions to improve the evaluation. <br /> <br />After the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet is completed by each Council Person the <br />Performance Evaluation Overview must be completed to determine the composite average in each <br />performance category and the overall Average Composite Evaluation Rating. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.