My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02 City Council (01/12/04)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
04 - April
>
2004-04-12
>
02 City Council (01/12/04)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:45 AM
Creation date
4/7/2004 3:06:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
2
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council
AGENDA - Date
1/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />January 12 , 2004 <br />Page 10 <br />Freese and Nichols studied each component of the Water Treatment Plant and <br />found a problem in the sedimentation basins. Mr. Mussullam stated the plant <br />was rated at 32.3 MGD but the reliable capacity of the sedimentation basins is <br />really about 20 MGD. He said when the sedimentation basins were designed <br />the effluent quality was at 1.0 NTU and is now less than 0.3 NTU which <br />indicates a need for bigger sedimentation basins. He related that the plant’s <br />filtration is at 31.1 MGD which is much higher than its rated capacity. They <br />projected about 28,800 residential water customers in 2025 with about 12,300 <br />connections. <br />Mr. Mussullam indicated the contract with Lamar County Water Supply <br />promises them up to 5 MGD. The study projected 25,000 population served <br />with about 10,000 connections in the county, excluding the City of Paris. He <br />stated that industrial customers, which includes Campbell’s Soup, Kimberly- <br />Clark and Tenaska, and Lamar Power Partners, accounted for 50% of the total <br />production of the water treatment plant. Mr. Mussullam said this means the <br />plant is producing enough water for a 50,000 or 60,000 population. <br />In looking at the Water Treatment Plant demand analysis, Mr. Mussullam said <br />what is important is population projections, historical use of the customers, the <br />number of connections (because the TCEQ regulates the treatment plant <br />capacity based on the number of connections, which is .6 G per minute per <br />connection), contractual obligations, industrial and wholesale, which means <br />that the Water Treatment Plant should be capable of meeting the worse case <br />scenario water demand. Taking all that into consideration, the study came up <br />with a 32.3 MGD for 2025. <br />Mussullam cited a TCEQ ruling that when a plant has reached 85% of its <br />capacity, it has to start planning for expansion. That would be when the plant <br />reached 27.4 MGD which would be in about 2010. However, he reminded <br />them that the reliable capacity was only 20.0 MGD, so something needs to be <br />done to bring the capacity up to the projected MGD. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.