Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REVISED DRAFT <br /> <br />customers, Campbell Soup, LCWSD and Tenaska III, including treated water losses allocated to <br /> <br />the retail customers of the City. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />Treated Water Use and Capacity ReQuirements of Customer Classes <br /> <br />To distribute functionalized system component costs to customer classes - residential class, <br /> <br />commercial class, Çampbell Soup, LCWSD and Tenaska III, assumptions had to be made as to <br /> <br />peak-day demands of residential and commercial classes of customers. The actual test year <br /> <br />average-day demands and peak-day demands were used for Campbell Soup, LCWSD and <br /> <br />Tenaska III. Table A-I in Appendix A shows the individual customer classes' average and peak- <br /> <br />day demands. Campbell Soup's water purchases from the City has declined over the past two <br /> <br />fiscal years (FY 1999/2000 and FY 2000/2001) and is continuing that trend this fiscal year (FY <br /> <br />2001/2002). In order to recognize the decrease in water purchases by Campbell Soup, the latest <br /> <br />available water purchases (October 2001 through January 2002) were combined with February <br /> <br />2001 through September 2001 as an estimate for FY 2001/2002 water consumption. It was <br /> <br />estimated that Campbell Soup would experience the same peak day volumes as incurred in FY <br /> <br />2000/2001. The table also shows the capacity factors for the classes as well as their relative <br /> <br />percentages of base and extra capacity components of the system used and useful in providing <br /> <br />service to the five customer classes during the test year. <br /> <br />City of Paris. Tems <br />Water and Wa.Slewaler Cast oflk",;ce Study <br />March 2003 <br /> <br />13 <br />