Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REVISED DRAFT <br /> <br />based upon the test year water system inch-feet percentages calculated on Table A-2 in <br /> <br />Appendix A. Hydrants/valves and meters/meter boxes remain separate categories for <br /> <br />cost allocation purposes. <br /> <br />Debt Service <br /> <br />The contracts for Campbell Soup and Tenaska III allow for adjustments in known and <br /> <br />measurable c:hanges from the end of the fiscal year to the cost of service determination. <br /> <br />Debt Service is based on the projected principal and interest payments for FY 2002/2003 <br /> <br />of the City's Current outstanding debt issues. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Water and Wastewater <br /> <br />Table B-1 in Appendix B and Table C-l in Appendix C present the allocation of the total utility <br /> <br />revenue requirement to water and wastewater for applicable treated water contract customers and <br /> <br />retail customers, respectively. <br /> <br />Raw water supply, water production, water distribution and <br /> <br />transmission, wastewater maintenance, wastewater treatment, and lift stations costs are directly <br /> <br />assigned to their respective function. Other operations and maintenance costs are allocated <br /> <br />between water and wastewater as follows; <br /> <br />'Varehouse <br /> <br />Warehouse costs are allocated 50/50 between water and wastewater under the assumption <br /> <br />that it services the water and wastewater system equally. <br /> <br />Hillin!! and Collectin!! <br /> <br />The billing and collecting function has been allocated 50/50 between water and <br /> <br />wastewater under the assumption that it services the water and wastewater system <br /> <br />equally. <br /> <br />City a/Paris. Tems <br />Water and Wastewater Cost a/Service Study <br />March 1003 <br /> <br />18 <br />