Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REVISED DRAFT <br /> <br />VI. <br /> <br />WATER UTILITY SYSTEM - FINANCIAL DATA <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Functionalization of Revenue Requirement <br /> <br />Table C-2 in Appendix C details the functionalization of adjusted expense levels into the various <br /> <br />Base-Extra Capacity and Customer Components ofthe System on the basis of factors previously <br /> <br />discussed in Section II of this report. The components and related expenses are as follows: <br /> <br />Base <br />Extra Capacity <br />Customer Costs <br /> <br />Revenue <br />Requirement <br />$4,353,520 <br /> <br />1,750,820 <br /> <br />347,277 <br /> <br />Total Revenue Requirement <br /> <br />$6,451,618 <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Customer Classes <br /> <br />Based upon the customer class allocation percentages developed in Section III of this report, the <br /> <br />Water Utility's revenue requirement has been allocated to the various customer classes (before <br /> <br />adjusting for contract customers' terms) as follows: <br /> <br />Campbell Soup <br />LCWSD <br /> <br />Revenue <br />Requirement <br />$2,174,171 <br /> <br />1,690,964 <br /> <br />1,277,184 <br /> <br />924,105 <br /> <br />385,193 <br /> <br />Residential <br />Commercial <br /> <br />Tenaska III <br /> <br />Total Revenue Requirement <br /> <br />$6,451,618 <br /> <br />CiryolParis. Texas <br />Water aad Wastewater Cost alService Study <br />March 2003 <br /> <br />20 <br />