My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-E Hist Pres Comm (03-01-04)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
05 - May
>
2004-05-10
>
08-E Hist Pres Comm (03-01-04)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:45 AM
Creation date
5/5/2004 2:43:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
8-E
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
Historic Preservation Commission
AGENDA - Date
3/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />She also stressed that Local Ordinances should have the following inclusions. <br />1. Purpose <br />2. Definitions <br />3. Review Board <br />4. Review Procedures <br />5. Designation criteria <br />6. Demolition delay <br />7. Appeals process <br /> <br />A discussion on the law governing the Open Meetings Act began with a question as to <br />what constitues the difference between a neighborhood group discussing Commission <br />Rules versus an entertainment gathering discussing the Commission Rules. <br /> <br />Some of the other issues raised were: <br />1. Our need for design guidelines raised by Becki Norment Arvin stated that we were <br />to use the National Historic Guidelines. <br /> <br />2. Paul noted that we are using these guidelines now, but we need more specific <br />guidelines due to the large number of materials that are available to property owners. <br /> <br />3 .Suzy Harper raised the question of being able to give the applications for Certificate <br />of Appropriateness to Commission members before the meeting so that they would <br />have a chance to study them. It was noted that this would be done in the future. <br /> <br />4. How do you handle changes to Certificates of Appropriateness was the question <br />raised by Tommy Haynes. One way is to table the Certificate and another way is to <br />reject the Certificate. The City Attorney, Larry Schenke offered this suggestion. <br />A. Table and have the applicant come back. <br />B. If tabled item is not ready in time frame, deny the Certificate. <br />5. Becki Norment: Time frames for completion of projects are not written in. Answer: <br />We must write them in. <br />6. Suzi Harper: As a Main Street Board member, how can the Board work with <br />the Commission? Answer: Together provide education incentives for craftsmen <br />who work on historic properties. <br />7. Bratton as a point of clarification stated that: Local Historic Districts are areas in <br />which historic buildings and their sellings are protected by public review. They are <br />designated on the basis of local criteria and local procedures. She gave the reasons for <br />consideration of a Historic District They were A. Can set boundaries based on the <br />distribution pattern of historic properties and other community considerations.B. Can be <br />tailored to specific community needs and provide greater protection for local resources. <br />Local designation is the first step toward legally preserving historic landmarks, <br />neighborhoods and downtown areas in community. Historic districts help protect the <br />setting and context of historic buildings. The benefits are: A. Preserves neighborhood <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.