My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-E Hist Pres Comm (02-23-04)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
05 - May
>
2004-05-10
>
08-E Hist Pres Comm (02-23-04)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:45 AM
Creation date
5/5/2004 2:46:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
8-E
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
Historic Preservation Commission
AGENDA - Date
2/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br /> <br />February 23,2004 Pagc 10 <br /> <br />and the stripe at the top. <br /> <br />Too much conversation <br /> <br />WOMAN: If there was a major objection to using the tics and the rails then you <br />could get the same proportion and the same horizontal look by doing what you <br />suggest. <br /> <br />DENNEY: That is only a possibility; its an option. It is not necessarily making <br />me vote against something. <br /> <br />WOMAN: I ean only imagine the overa1l of the 11 acres or however much is there <br />that there would be a place for ifthis is a hi storie railroad crossing sign then it can <br />still be used somewhere even if it is not used out here on the street. <br /> <br />SUAREZ: What is the thought about perhaps incorporating that marquis <br />somewhere on that sign so that there could be information, required events. <br /> <br />WILSON: Raise where it says Chamber ofCommeree and then put the maquis <br />strip underneath it. And incorporate it in to the sign itself. <br /> <br />SUAREZ: Ok. So shall we just go back to the drawing board and maybe bring <br />some other thoughts to you next time. <br /> <br />ST ARRETT: I persona1ly, Linda, would like to know... I like Barbara's idea about <br />the marquis being on the lower portion of your primary sign; PaLti had some good <br />thoughts ahout tying to the building, not that the railroad ties don't; I am really <br />concerned about the railroad crossing sign whieh potentially could be somewhere <br />else on the property without any problem but not knowing what TxDot might <br />approve and sinee that is part of the application I would like to move that this be <br />tabled until the next meeting and then we could get the answer from TxDot , work <br />with your designer and then come baek perhaps with another option. <br /> <br />SUAREZ: Ok. Marvin do you have any questions since I wi1l be taking it baek to <br />you. <br /> <br />MARVIN: No I think I got it all. <br /> <br />SUAREZ: Thank you very mueh. <br /> <br />STARRETT: Thank you Linda very much. I called for a motion to table this <br />item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.