Laserfiche WebLink
"ENTICING THE LITERATE, NON- READING YOUNG ADULT INTO THE LIBRARY ": <br />This program's title caught my attention because I know we need to <br />succeed in this area in our Library and I was interested in learning what <br />author Gary Paulsen, author of two Newbery Honor Books: Hatchet and <br />Dogsong had to say about the matter. He discussed the issues involved in <br />why kids who can read don't and his consensus was that reading has been <br />too closely associated with schoolwork and often perceived almost as <br />punishment. He noted the majority of kids with high reading skills too <br />often only read when it's required, and seldom for pleasure, and those <br />with low reading skills only read when there is absolutely no other choice <br />but to do so. He writes for that small majority which reads for pleasure <br />and believes a mandatory silent reading session during the school day <br />would be very beneficial because it would introduce kids to the fun of <br />reading and consequently to its usefulness. Kids relate to interesting <br />facts and stories which make sense in their language, and certainly to <br />reading which entertains. <br />And, as many of us agreed, entertainment can often be quite <br />educational - it's the enticement to begin reading which is most difficult <br />to establish. In the public libraries, the enticement can be programs <br />which promote further inquiry into a subject via the printed format. Or <br />it can be the involvment by kids in producing their own reading materials. <br />Or the concerned professional librarian who suggests additional <br />information in the form of fun, interesting material for leisure reading. <br />Whatever methods prove successful, those methods are what we must utilize! <br />"LIBRARY VOLUNTEERS: PLEASURES AND PITFALLS ": <br />Small and medium -size public libraries can reap enormous benefits by <br />having a well organized volunteer program. Volunteers can assist paid <br />staff, perform useful but not necessarily critical tasks, and augment <br />services and programs. Volunteers do not replace paid staff and this <br />should be made clear to all concerned. <br />The more organized and formal the program, the less problems will be <br />encountered. Position descriptions should be available and a volunteer <br />should be recruited, interviewed, selected, supervised, and evaluated just <br />like other employees. Attendance records should be kept and <br />projects /tasks completed recorded /publicized. The two main differences <br />between volunteer staff and paid staff are usually the evaluation is not <br />written and the recognition is not monetary. <br />Recognition is often the key to the success of a volunteer program <br />and library administrators must not forget that a simple greeting and <br />thank you to a volunteer go a long ways in ensuring merit performances and <br />continued service. Of course, recognition can be more elaborate and we <br />discussed other ways in which a library with a small budget can say thanks <br />but I won't mention them now because of the surprise factor! <br />"PROJECT LEADERSHIP: STATEWIDE LIBRARY AUTOMATION STANDARDS ": <br />This open forum drew a most concerned standing- room -only crowd and <br />was scheduled to provide TLA members with an opportunity to ask questions <br />about and provide input for the State Library's proposed document about <br />automation standards. The Library Development Division's intent is for <br />libraries to follow the standards and thus be more confident that funds <br />committed to major automation activities would be wisely spent and that <br />their large machine readable database files could be transferred to newer <br />systems. Also, most automation projects funded by the State Library with <br />state or federal funds would be required to follow the standards beginning <br />September 1, 1990. <br />