My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-2008
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
TASK FORCE ON CODE ENFORCEMENT
>
2007-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:30:20 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 10:08:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Discussion of and possible action on recommending the adoption of a comprehensive <br />parking ordinance <br />Chairman Wilson inquired of the Committee if they wanted to proceed with general <br />discussion or a detailed review. Marilyn Belevance said she preferred to do directly into an in depth <br />review of the proposed ordinance. Pete Kampfer asked why some of the ordinance was grayed out, <br />and Lisa Wright stated that the sections in gray are the technical provisions of the ordinance, and the <br />Task Force was welcome to review them; however, they're based on standards practices and State <br />requirements. <br />Lisa Wright informed the Committee that the proposed ordinance Sections 10 -102 and 10- <br />103, the list of uses and minimum requirements, were more comprehensive and more current. She <br />stated the current ordinance had been on the books since the 1970s, and the dust -free ordinance <br />section since 1989. Lisa Wright also stated that a business owner who made an expansion to or <br />changed the use of his building would be required to bring the parking lot up to code under the new <br />ordinance. <br />Chairman Wilson said they should exercise caution when making decisions about the <br />ordinance because they wanted to be fair and promote growth. <br />Chairman Wilson moved to Sections 10 -102 and 10 -103. On recommendation of staff, a <br />Motion to approve Sections 10 -102 and 10 -103 was made by Bee Gannon and seconded by Council <br />Member Brown. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Chairman Wilson moved to Section 10 -104. Sub - Section (a) was discussed at length by the <br />Committee, specifically whether or not to have screening next to a residence and whether parking <br />should be allowed at the front of a building that was next to a residence. It was a consensus of the <br />Committee to have staff re -word sub - section (a) and bring back to the next meeting. Chairman <br />Wilson also asked staff to bring a copy of the current ordinance red -lined for review by the <br />Committee. It was a consensus of the Committee to delete sub - sections (b) and (d). <br />Chairman Wilson inquired of staff as to how to deal with the size of trucks that could or <br />could not be parked in driveways, and he asked if we could add motor homes to the list of things that <br />cannot be parked on the street. Lisa Wright said parking on the street was already handled through <br />the traffic ordinance as far as semis go; however, she said she would get with Chief Louis to expand <br />what vehicles we might add to that. <br />Chairman Wilson moved to Sections 10 -105 and 10 -106. After review, it was a consensus <br />of the Committee to approve the sections as written. <br />Chairman Wilson moved to S ection 10 -108. It was a consensus of the Committee to approve <br />sub - sections (a)(1 -9) and to delete sub - section (I 0)(a-d). <br />Chairman Wilson moved to Section 10 -109. It was a consensus of the Committee to delete <br />the last sentence of the paragraph. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.