My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-2008
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
TASK FORCE ON CODE ENFORCEMENT
>
2007-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:30:20 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 10:08:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As requested by City Council, Chairman Wilson advised the Committee they would be <br />discussing and making recommendations on this item as it related to the electronic signs. He stated <br />that review of the other signs would require a lot of additional time and would be reviewed at a later <br />date. <br />Lisa Wright showed a video depicting sign issues and their effect on cities. <br />Chairman Wilson cited the sign issues as being color; brightness; and the length of time an <br />image is held including simple text and animation. Mr. Wilson said he had spoken with a sign <br />company representative and learned that the average time was ten seconds. <br />Gary Forrest with Forrest Signs asked if the sign on the loop is what started the restrictions <br />on the signs. Chairman Wilson said it was not and went on to say that someone wanted to install a <br />large animated sign. Mr. Forrest asked if current signs would be grandfathered. Chairman Wilson <br />said the size could be grandfathered, but that the length of time, scrolling, brightness and animation <br />would be restricted as outlined in the ordinance. Gary Forrest wanted to know why there was a need <br />to regulate the signs. Cheryt Moore said Paris did not need to take on the appearance of Las Vegas. <br />Bruce Frazier asked for an explanation of what the State was proposing in way of regulating <br />signs. Lisa Wright reported the Texas Department of Transportation was proposing the following: <br />a. Electronic signs may be located on either side of the highway; however, each sign <br />must only be visible from one direction of travel; <br />b. Each message on an electronic sign shall be displayed for at least eight seconds and <br />a change of message shall be accomplished within two seconds; <br />C. A change of message must occur simultaneously on the entire sign face; and <br />d. An electronic sign may not include more than 20 different displays per cycle, <br />excluding emergency displays and public service announcements. <br />A Motion to limit the message to eight seconds, that the change of message take place within <br />two seconds and eliminate drop -ins was made by Charles Richards and seconded by Don Taylor and <br />Jim Lassiter. There was additional discussion regarding time and temperature. Charles Richards <br />amended his Motion to include an exception to the regulation would be that the temperature could <br />be displayed every three seconds. Don Taylor seconded the Motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />There was brief discussion between the Committee and Barbara Onstott, Vice President of <br />Marketing for Datatronic Control, Inc. with regard to the size of the signs. A Motion was made by <br />Oscar Johnson to allow signs up to a maximum size of 32 square feet on Loop 286 and signs up to <br />a maximum 10 square feet in the other areas. The Motion was seconded by Charles Fulbright. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Next Chairman Wilson directed the Committee's attention to the height of the signs. Lisa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.