My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-1991
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY COMMITTEE
>
1987-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:33:11 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 10:12:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />will be able to tell you whether the city has good contracts or bad <br />contracts. <br />Barry Sarma, Consulting Engineer with Freese & Nichols, Inc., appeared <br />before the Committee, telling them he has gone through the city's three <br />water rights permits, one at Pat Mayse which is a Federal Reservoir, <br />that the city has total rights of 55 MGD, Lake Crook which is <br />approximately 1200 acre feet a year making a total of 65 MGD. <br />Currently the city is using 12 million gallons of water a day which <br />means you are using about 20% of the water rights. Mr. Sarma said the <br />city has 80% of their water in storage for future use, and someone has <br />to pay for it. Mr. Sarma said under the city's contract with Lamar <br />County Water Supply District they have a guarantee of 16.7 MGD of <br />water, and they are not paying for that storage. <br />Mr. Sarma discussed the fact that the city has Lake Crook right next to <br />the water treatment plant which would cost less to pump and transmit, <br />that this might something for the city to look at. <br />Mr. Sarma said he has looked at the projected population for the City <br />of Paris, and in the past few years Paris has not grown, but the <br />consumption of water has increased and explained that population is not <br />the only way to increase consumption. <br />Mr. Sarma told the Committee that the planning process is very <br />important to any city, they have to look beyond the current year or <br />two, and the system the city of Paris currently has, and the raw water <br />that is available the city would have 30 to 40 years of growth. <br />Mr. Sarma stated the third problem the city has is with the violations <br />as for as infiltration - inflow problems, and expressed the seriousness <br />of these violations, the EPA which you have two administrative orders, <br />and one letter from the Texas Water Commission regarding this matter. <br />Mr. Sarma said the city has to look at the system and how to improve it <br />in order to meet the requirements of the permits. <br />Mr. Sarma expressed the need to start paying for the water rights at <br />Pat Mayse before someone steps in and requested the water rights to Pay <br />Mayse. The City of Paris needs to protect their water rights by <br />starting to pay for that right, and as for as the rate goes, we need <br />your input as to how financing may be achieved and future upgrading for <br />the system. <br />Mr. Stowe discussed the issuance of bonds - stating that in the City's <br />bond covenant, if the City issues Revenue Bonds, you have to go to a <br />1.25 coverage, or your revenue minus your operating expenses will have <br />to equal that operating income 1.25 times the total interest cost of <br />your new and existing debt, if it does not reach that point prior to <br />issuing bonds, you can not issue bonds. Mr. Stowe said this is what <br />happened in 1984, the city had to issue Certificate of Obligation Bonds <br />which is backed by Ad Valorem tax because in 1983 the city did not have <br />1.25 coverage. Mr. Stowe said they will be coming to you as to when we <br />can look toward a bond issue, when do you have to have your coverage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.