Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Water & Sewer Subcommittee <br />March 25, 2003 <br />Page 7 <br />about those that are proposed and not yet adopted. Mr. Campbell said the .03 <br />turbidity requirement is already in place now and the city does not know <br />what maximum capacity the plant can meet at this time. He said that is the <br />big problem, because the plant is peaking out at 20.5 million and the city <br />does not know how much above that the plant can go. Mr. Campbell said <br />this is called design criteria and Freese and Nichols will calculate that figure. <br />He added that the state requires Paris to have a certain capacity. Paris must <br />have a capacity greater than the maximum day. If you do not have that <br />greater capacity the state will make you build extra capacity; probably <br />through an administrative order. Mr. Campbell reported that when the plant <br />was modified in 1994, the city changed the way they operated. Previously, if <br />people needed more water the city had to increase the pumps at the Water <br />Treatment Plant which drew more water through the plant and surged the <br />filters. He said they built a four million gallon ground storage tank and built <br />four more pumps at ground storage, so all the water for the plant goes out at a <br />steady rate. Then if there is a need for more water, another pump is turned on <br />at ground storage and this has no effect on the water treatment plant. <br />Mr. Campbell stated that another consideration is that at this time Pat Mayse <br />Lake has a minimum safety of 55 million gallons a day. Paris currently has <br />the right to purchase all of that water in 11 million gallon increments a day; <br />the city has to pay for this. There is a day coming, if the city does not keep <br />the plant up to size, that the city will lose some of those water rights. <br />Councilwoman Neeley asked Mr. Anderson if the city could do a rate study <br />more often than every three years. Mr. Anderson advised that for some time <br />he had advocated doing an annual rate study because circumstances can <br />change rapidly enough to adversely affect the city financially. The past two <br />or three years has proven that to be the case. Jack Stowe had mentioned in <br />his presentation that the city had under collected about $600,000.00 for one <br />year because the city did not update annually. <br />Chairman Plata made the statement that rate increases should be the last thing <br />the city does. A rate increase is good because the city will recoup the money <br />