My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
WATER AND SEWER SUBCOMMITTEE
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:38:17 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 10:56:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Water &. Sewer Subcommittee <br />Feb. 18, 2003 <br />Page 9 <br />the quality of water below what the state mandates. So, why would the city do <br />anything that would increase cost or debt? <br />City Manager Malone explained that this last debt issuance was to meet the EPA <br />Administrative Order and there was a list of projects provided by that <br />engineering study that the city was forced to do. City Manager Malone said the <br />study identified all of the elements in the system that needed to be replaced or <br />repaired and the EPA determined that the city would be given three years to get <br />it done. The City Manager said the city attacked these projects with local <br />contractors doing work by the day and direction from the engineering inspectors <br />to try to save money. He said the debt was issued in anticipation of being able <br />to assure the EPA that we had the funds available to fix all of these things that <br />they were telling us to fix in this period of time. City Manager Malone advised <br />that the city was successful in working our way out of the EPA Order much <br />cheaper than what the consultants estimated. He said the city took the savings <br />from these projects and is using the money to build the elevated storage tank. <br />The money is already in the debt service. He said they were shifting what they <br />would have spent on these repairs that were demanded by the EPA because the <br />city was able to do them more efficiently than what the engineering study <br />suggested. The City Manager advised that the city is able to use that savings <br />towards other needs and we are taking the highest priority needs. Mr. Wilson <br />wanted to know if the city can pay for it in savings on pumping cost and in <br />electricity. The City Manager pointed out that is not the only element, it is also <br />an element if you look at these other cities and see the capacity of overhead <br />storage for fire protection. He said the city has been inadequate in overhead <br />storage for fire protection for many years. He concluded his answer by saying <br />that you have accomplished energy savings as well as having water available for <br />fire protection needs. Mr. Campbell said that at one time, depending on the <br />situation, if the city lost power at the pumping station downtown and it was at <br />the low level at the tank where we operate, he would have fifteen minutes to call <br />every industry to shut them down before they reached minimum fire protection <br />level and that is totally inadequate for a city this size. <br />Councilwoman Neeley asked what did transfers mean as shown on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.