My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
WATER AND SEWER SUBCOMMITTEE
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:38:17 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 10:56:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
View images
View plain text
City Council Water & Sewer Subcommittee <br />Feb. 18, 2003 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Anderson advised that they did have some meetings to look at that and that <br />was at the time that City Attorney Schenk had his accident and at this time, it <br />has not been done. <br />City Attorney Schenk explained that part of the problem is the city is not going <br />to escape their obligation to provide the wastewater service. Chairman Plata <br />said the study states that in 1969 the city was currently charging a rate of $0.84 <br />per thousand gallons of metered water for service in excess of minimum charge. <br />Mr. Campbell said that is the sewer charge also. Chairman Plata said the study <br />recommended that the city begin charging Toco the residential wastewater <br />volume exit rate of $3.57 per thousand gallons. He said the current contract <br />does not have a definite termination date. Chairman Plata stated he does not <br />want to be subsidizing Toco. City Attorney Schenk advised they have had <br />negotiations to do with several entities over the outside city services, which he <br />hopes to turn to the city's advantage. The City Attorney said they have been <br />focusing primarily on the Lamar County situation because they are the largest, <br />single entity and generally what is going to happen is the city is going to <br />establish whatever the city's policy is going to be for that entity and the others <br />will have that expectation that the city will follow that same policy with regard <br />to them. He said his primary concern, from a legal standpoint, is the folks in <br />Lamar County, because they have brought a number of issues that Mr. Anderson <br />has spent months going through trying to resolve charges that we have assessed <br />them verses what their claim is and should have been charged. City Attorney <br />Schenk said they were at a point where they have finally resolved all of those <br />discrepancies and now they are going to talk about long term as to what is the <br />city's obligation to them in regard to the amount of water they should receive <br />and what they should pay for the water. He anticipated going to the smaller <br />entities and using that basis in dealing with them. Mr. Anderson advised that <br />Toco is only sewer and it is an insignificant amount, and they get their water <br />from Lamar County Water Supply. He said the city does not bill those people <br />individually. Lamar County Water Supply pays for their water, and the sewer <br />volume is based on the assumption number that Lamar County supplies the city. <br />It is something that needs to be addressed, but if it was a bump in the road you <br />would never feel it if you drove over it because it is so small. Mr. Campbell <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).