Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />d- L <br />SURFACE WATER MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT <br />FOR PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS THAT ARE USING SURFACE WATER SOURCES <br />OR GROUND WATER SOURCES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SURFACE WATER t <br />Summary Page r()�Y/ORiGINAI FILED <br />PUBLIC WATER PLANT NAME <br />SYSTEM NAME: CITY OF PARIS WATER'�REATMENT PLANT OR NUMBER: <br />I certify. at I m tam�liar with rmation contai ed in this report and that, <br />to the o my knowledge a In atbn is trul complete, and accurate. <br />PWS ID No.: 1390002 Operator's Signature: <br />Report for <br />the Month of: January 2003 Certificate No. & Grade: 56356- 4666ESW Date: February 10, 2003 <br />TREATMENT PLANT PERFORMANCE <br />-, <br />Total number of turbidity readings: 186 <br />Number of 4-hour periods when plant was off -line: <br />0 <br />Number of readings above 0.10 NTU: 11 <br />Number of 4 -hour periods when plant was on-line <br />Were more than 5.0% of the turbidity readings above the acceptable level? <br />see(I)above <br />Number of readings above 0.3 NTU: 0 <br />but turbidity data was not collected: <br />0 <br />Number of readings above 0.5 NTU: 0 <br />No <br />Number of readings above 1.0 NTU: 0 <br />Were there any days with turbidity readings above 5.0 NTU? - see (3) above <br />No <br />Maximum allowable turbidity level: 0.3 <br />Number of days with readings above 1.0 NTU: <br />(2) <br />Percentage of readings above this limit: 0.0 % (1) <br />Number of days with readings above 5.0 NTU: <br />(3) <br />Statistical Maximum turbidity reading: <br />0.20 NTU Average turbidity value: <br />0.09 NTU <br />Summary Minimum turbidity reading: <br />0.08 NTU Standard deviation: <br />0.012 NTU <br />Additional report(s) for individual fitter monitoring required: <br />• NONE O Filter Profile O Filter Assessment <br />O CPE <br />Additional report(s) for individual filter monitoring submitted: <br />• NONE O Filter Profile O Filter Assessment <br />O CPE <br />Number of days when plant was on -line <br />but individual fitter turbidity data was not collected: <br />0 <br />Number of days with a low CT <br />Average log inactivation for Giardia: <br />3.50 <br />for no more than 4.0 consecutive hours: 0 <br />Average log inactivation for viruses: <br />100.2 <br />Number of days with a low CT <br />Number of days when profiling data was not collected: <br />0 <br />for more than 4.0 consecutive hours: (4) <br />Number of days when CT data was not collected: <br />0 <br />Minimum disinfectant residual required leaving the plant: <br />0.2 mglL • Free Chlorine O Total Chlorine <br />Number of days with a low residual <br />for no more than 4.0 consecutive hours: 0 <br />Number of days with a low residual <br />Number of days when disinfectant residual <br />for more than 4.0 consecutive hours: (5) <br />leaving the plant was not properly monitored: <br />0 <br />DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM <br />Minimum disinfectant residual required in distribution system: 0.2 mg1L • Free Chlorine O Total Chlorine <br />Total number of readings this month: 42 <br />Average disinfectant residual value: 2.26 Percentage of readings with a low residual this month: F 0.0 % (6A) <br />Number of readings with a low residual: 0 <br />Number of readings with no detectable residual: 0 Percentage of readings with a low residual last month: F--O.-01%(6B) <br />PUBLIC NOTIFICATION <br />-, <br />TREATMENT TECHNIQUE VIOLATIONS <br />YESINO <br />It YES, date when notice was given to: <br />COMMISSIONO <br />CUSTOME S' <br />Were more than 5.0% of the turbidity readings above the acceptable level? <br />see(I)above <br />No <br />Were there any days with turbidity readings above 1.0 NTU? - see (2) above <br />No <br />Were there any days with turbidity readings above 5.0 NTU? - see (3) above <br />No <br />Were there any periods when the plant failed to meet the CT requirements for more than 4.0 <br />consecutive hours? - see (4) above <br />No <br />Were there any periods when the residuals leaving the plant fell below the acceptable level for <br />more than 4.0 consecutive hours? - see (5) above <br />No <br />Were more than 5.0% of the residuals in the distribution system below the acceptable level fo <br />two months In a row? - see (6A) and (6B) above <br />No <br />uy u . ,�... w�..,�N vy. <br />' Copies of each Public Notice must accompany this report <br />Submit the report by the 10th of the month following the reporting period to: <br />TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br />WATER PERMITS AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DIVISION (MC -155) <br />P.O. BOX 13087, AUSTIN, TEXAS 787113087 <br />TNRCC - 0102C (12 -01-00) PAGE 1 SWMOR <br />. 1 )0/- <br />