2008-2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

reservoir, that you have a lot of flexibility provided to you in a sale of that sort because of the storage that's available. Take Lamar Power, for example. They have an 8 mgd life on their current plant. If they needed 8 mgd of water to meet that peak demand, it's available for them. But on an annual average basis, they use 3.36 mgd of water. They don't need 8 mgd times 24/7. And yet that's what's tied up in that contract. And so I think that you'll find that there's a lot of flexibility in terms of being able to meet those peak demands and still have access to that water on a long -term average basis, because you don't necessarily have to deliver that water to Irving to meet that peak demand. Their system provides for meeting peak demand but you need to deliver that water to them over an annual average basis, because once it moves from Pat Mayse Lake into Cooper Lake, they've got it stored and they move it into the metroplex and the rest of their system to meet their peak demand. It's an engineering question, not a legal question, but clearly from a contracting standpoint, you could seek to identify a base amount of water that you could supply Irving based on your pure surplus water. You could supplement that base amount with the amount that is reasonably available to you between the contractual obligations and the needs of those customers. And then you could always reserve the right to bring that water back as needed. But I don't even any of that implicates the peak demand issue, because you have the infrastructure capable of meeting those peak demands. Either you have it or you could design for it. Question: you'd also have to provide that when (inaudible), water would not be available to the City of Irving? JM: You certainly could do that. You may choose to do something like that. Question: to eliminate the possibility of having to ration water because of the lake level? JM: You could in essence design in a contract a ration scheme for them which included ultimately a cutoff of delivery during certain circumstances, well in advance of any type of local rationing. So, again, there's a lot of technical issues that would have to be reduced conceptionally to what you want to do, and then abstract it into the contract, but clearly you could do those kind of things. Question: Can you sell water to someone and keep them from selling it to someone else? JM: If you're going to sell somebody your water, you can limit their use of that water however you see fit. Most of the contracts now with industrial users, they can use it for industrial purposes, and that's it. They can't go resell it to somebody else, or they can't build a different type plant and use it for that purpose. You can choose to do that. You can choose if you want to, to put provisions in there that if he resells the water, if he gets some premium on it you get some portion of that premium. These are clearly negotiated transactions, and I can't tell you what a willing buyer and a willing seller would agree to, but you can offer anything that you want to in regard to terms, conditions and limitations on their use of the water. OK, No. 12 -- the Paris contract with the Corps of Engineers. The contract you have with the Corps identifies your ownership as 100 percent of the water between 415 msl and 451 msl. This is estimated to contain 109,600 acre feet of storage after 100 years of sedimentation. Not as of the time of the contract, but after 100 years of sedimentation. That number is derived after looking at 100 years of sedimentation. So I would submit to you that a question to be raised about this, there's more capacity in this reservoir, more yield in this reservoir, over the next 50 years until we get to 100 years after its creation. And so you have both the sedimentation pool to look at, as well as the flood pool. With regard to time frames and difficulties, I'll be real honest with you. I've not actually ever participated in one of these reallocation studies directly myself, so I don't know what the timelines are. I know that the Corps staff in Tulsa has met with your staff, and I know the Corps staff is very experienced with these