Laserfiche WebLink
2 -9 -10 <br />Present: <br />Jordan Harper, Gary Brown, Mike Davenport, Dale Maberry, Kim Stephens, Shawn <br />Napier, FEwl=n 4ekle, Charles Waldrum, Carolyn Whelchel, Bryan Hargis, Ke*ing-Kea-r- <br />Meeting called to order at 5:07 <br />Approved mintures from Jan 26th meeting <br />Deliberate and review meeting 1 -26 -10 <br />Wldrum apologized subcommittee could not get together for meeting. Waldrum has <br />finished reading the book itself w /proposed ordiancens and thinks the committee should <br />essentially adopt the 06FC "as -is" w /out adding additional sections and also stated do we <br />need to take out some sections. He does nto thingk we need to add to it anymore. He <br />asked for input from the builders on the committee to considerd this. Waldurm <br />personally thinks that adding is a a burden, not much sense that every city is the same. <br />Waldrum suggested that possibly we need to delete some items. Harper agrees, Fuston <br />states w /the age of code are are using let try to use it, wait a few years then see if it needs <br />some changes and/or updates. The builders are aware this is what is used. Hargis agrees <br />and states it would simplify; Davenport asks is there anything we absolutely need to add? <br />Waldrum -lets review the ordinace by each line item <br />Started at page 1 of Amendments in notebook and ended on Page 11 of Amendments at <br />308.3.1. <br />Minutes approved by Waldrum from previous meeting. <br />Next meeting scheduled for February 23, 2010 <br />Dale Maberry made a comment to committee that said these requests began with <br />Woodard, recognized by COG the amendments the comm.. has removed are not a <br />problem, they felt like they had to follow COG. <br />Meeting adjourned at 7 pm. <br />