Laserfiche WebLink
Condensed notes of the amendments beginning on Page 1 through Page 11, Art. III, <br />Sec. 12.51. through Sec. 308.31 <br />Page 1- no changes <br />Art III -add text 2006 and 3rd printing 2007 <br />Spelling correction, 3rd line knows needs to be known <br />Sec. 12 -52 (b) leave in. Fire Chief, clarifies it, delete (c) and (d) <br />Sec 12.53- delete the words "and reenact" and delete the rest of para after 2006 IFC. <br />Sec. 102.1 delete totally. <br />Sec. 102.4 amend and remove "building other"; in the paragraph on 2nd line delete "and <br />the building codes" and on 4th line delete "which are within .......IBC <br />Sec. 102.6 after discussion of deleting, Dale said a COG recommendation, Harper <br />suggests we revisit; it actually makes it less stringent. Will revisit. <br />105.1.4 delete totally, this is city regulated <br />105.4, on 4th line beginning at "plus an additional..... 3d party plan review" will be <br />deleted. This will be covered in a fee schedule with city. <br />Sec. 105.6 we have to delete if we do not permit, so delete all the subsections <br />105.6.15 all is fine except for one typo <br />105.6.23 D. Maberry feels important to have this added <br />105.6.30 after discussion, this was the consensus of the committee to leave in. <br />105.7 will leave in <br />105.7.14 Charles suggested we delete, D. Maberry said a lot of red lines in town that <br />don't apply and cause problems and are used for no parking only, too much red paint out <br />there that does not mean anything, G. Brown suggested we revisit this one. <br />106.2 Deleted <br />106.2.2 Waldrum suggests we delete <br />106.2.3 this is an add on, decided to delete <br />109.2.3.1 this is an add on, Waldrum asked if we really need this, D. Maberry said it is <br />only for clarification, decision made to delete. <br />109.3 Waldrum has reviewed this and rewritten a condensed version., Fee's min of $100 <br />& max of $10,000., will use the verbiage in the book and fill in the blanks, will remove <br />the wording "deemed guilty ". We will revisit this paragraph <br />111.4 does not cover all entities, Waldrum proposed new wording, and committee agrees <br />to go by book, fill in the blanks and then define the entities <br />202 these are only definitions, will be left in except for the last five. <br />302.1 adding wording to bonfires, wording to define bonfire size, remove the word <br />"cubic" suggested verbiage to read "20x20xl2 and leave out cubic <br />307.2 not needed will be deleted in its entirety <br />307.2.1 remove this, state law applies anyway <br />307.2.2 this is an add on, currently we do not have this authority, would be good to have <br />if we are in a burn ban and a farmer has an existing permit to burn. Add new wording to <br />cover all entities. <br />307.4 committee felt this would be more restrictive, state law controls anyway, D. <br />Maberry said we need it defined, since we are a municipality we can go against state, this <br />will be left in. <br />307.4.1 and 307.4.2 will be deleted as requested <br />Exhibit A <br />