Laserfiche WebLink
IzAtim n McKinnty they called for a mtion to deny the request. There was none. <br />Mr. Thr;ratup stated he wnuld have no objtctiuns to ahe request if the property <br />had boar offered for self for resfidenttsl use End no one wanted it for that <br />purpose. <br />Nor. Rowe was questioned ft -, hher abrit lighting and <br />rants had been ri- de wi0 Texas Poi^ zr & Light Co. to <br />r,imibcr of guavd. lights far the property and further <br />Ved unless they wre wi thIn the building area. <br />Chaff 6 tto t ?(Ainney again called for a motion. <br />trees. Pt stated arrange - <br />provide the necessary <br />stated no trees would be <br />Mr. FtapT es moved the zoning request be recommended for approval. Mrs. Young <br />s- ov 14 v the motion which carried unanimously. <br />,11 i"c'�l isring ors s then held cm annexation of two tracts of land. Tract 1, <br />a 0.63 acre tract locatzA on the east side of Gordon Lake road south of Old <br />W, ,,"tan Rod and Tract 2, 11.607 acres heated south of Morningslde Drive <br />east of Loop 286. <br />Ns cne v,,lts present; to spelk cancer°n%g either of the tracts Involved. <br />Mr: micCollor. t ld the Commission that owners of both tracts had requested the <br />C xy ti annex V:vm. Mr. Ernest Randle, ewner of Tract 1 desired annexation <br />of *t1r K;tcr and sanitary sewer service to his residence. Gene <br />R . ° °. -u4o Rrm4r., c.mcrs of Tract. ?requested annexation in order to develop <br />ntolna p �rtlon of Morningside Estates. <br />130 ' g discussion, "1r. Thorntan mad 9 a ration that both tracts be . recomm- <br />­ cue fir L re,- , ti n, Far. Staples se;°onded the motion and all �roted aye. <br />W" rt,4E11 7fincry Plat -,f 4orth Ptrk Estates No. 2 was unanimously approved <br />�Pn ' icn IT.;° Mr. Tay '> n, secqndcA by Mrs. 'Young subject to a 6" water <br />fn PIS--e of 4" proposte. In 36th N.E. es recommended by the Director <br />3 'Aal fc Wt..rkz In °+ . rw ' pan dated may 3, 1976 and attached hereto. <br />The Prelimiaary 11"at: of Fine Mill Vill&je No. S was unanimously approved on <br />ti p <br />by mr. 'tag u!� , s tc ided by Mr. Thornton subject to compliance with <br />i y the D17ecter of Public Works memorandum dated May 3, <br />717C and attached hereto. <br />7-Le !'rato f' i 1ricry 21::xt of Ella Key Ade-ition No. 2 was thz next item for con - <br />sid 'fie.; Dirt.,,: ter of PubsIc Works had rec ended approval subject <br />of z ilckerl Street payswent for the full east -vest <br />f1z_ subdivision, provision of a 10 foot utility <br />.� "_ z ' r� 3 F33+a'l A and review o,"' drainage with con- <br />t t. <br />atert plans. <br />