Laserfiche WebLink
I N U S OF' T HE B OA FZ � 0,1F A D a US T E ifl' <br />Cil-Y U.: PARIS') 'TEXAS <br />MARCH 51 'J.975 <br />Th 3 Board o-? Adiustfiienll' ,)f the City of Pali-is, Texas met in a called meeting <br />earnest.! [larch 5, 1975, at 5:?5 P.M. in thre Council Room of City Hall <br />witin ti-a folTowl'ng r.sFabers, prese-Pt: <br />1. F. Du Mallory, III Chairman <br />2. Ben Hinds <br />34 Hey -schal fIcKinnay <br />4 Richard Nafe <br />5, C! arlie Walker <br />The meeting was called order by ChWi,,,aa MoU'3ry and the minutes of <br />December 5, 1974 ware appraved, <br />C".-Irn.an fs,,aliory welcurnczd Richard Nlafe as an altleri-iate member of the Board <br />,­,presslng thanks f;C)r his ;'fillingness to serv'e. <br />'he rrxt itain to ba taken up was the petition o-;' Mr. 'e-arnard W. Krolqht for <br />as variance to Ordinance No. 1710, Section 9-501, SIde Yard Requirements on <br />0 ; -"-iop locatled at 213F0 Br"arsvood Drive. <br />Lot 4, Vock 9 Hillcrest Add16 <br />Mrs,, !!,'nWqht urcis present an.d stated her das1re to enclose an existine cc:er.ed- <br />patio to be usC.1 as a ur-flity, ro.31n. She sald it would match the construction <br />o'F her hcyia and although, it would be a 'Ittle 'less than three feet from the <br />side property line, her na ghbor on that side did not object to it. A letter <br />to that Effect frcfii Mr. Randy. Johnsan was shown to the "Soard. <br />A building pa-niit for this had bzen denied due to a five foot minimum side <br />yard requirement. <br />Chain,.ian Mallory stated sid-e yard requiremant. was for thin pratection. of <br />the property owners and that a building that close to the line would inhibit <br />the passage of fire fighting equilizient. Mr. Wa`9ker stated that even though <br />her neighbor did not at) ' fect, he might sell his property and a new owner <br />may wish to add on in a slimilar manner. The pre:-1,ent patio ca'ler is ncn- <br />confoy%iing to the ovdldnance and was pro'.-O.bly built without a pevinit prior 1',o <br />purchase by Mr. Kn- ght al-11 thelie was som.e concern as to wheather the preseot <br />slab %ruld be adeqvate -11"o Support the proposed addition. <br />by the Director &f Cn_,1=n1ty Develorment aEd ithe Building <br />�nspector was to deny th- varlance. <br />rollowing, dlscru3s;-Nn'b ' rilsr� walker a iyiotlan '-,) disallow tie variance. <br />Nafe second--d " e miotlbon and it cay'r-i"ed unarlwously. <br />4-""th no Vurllhar k-'u,,,inass the ­,Zating was adourned. <br />[b C_ <br />C N. McColl Uln <br />-)0"retary, Est - officio <br />