My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
14 - RECYCLING PERMIT
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2015
>
04 APRIL
>
04/27/2015
>
14 - RECYCLING PERMIT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2015 9:29:26 AM
Creation date
4/23/2015 2:48:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and satisfy their concerns. Tri -State advised staff they intended to obtain a stormwater permit for <br />the site, would likely cover the facility to prevent stormwater contacting materials, and install an <br />oil /sediment interceptor onsite. On February 2, 2015 I asked if issues concerning noise and <br />stormwater had been addressed as agreed in July, and was told by Mr. Glick that some had not. I <br />subsequently learned that they had intentionally not met with neighbors -- contrary to our <br />agreement. I also learned that they had changed the look and layout of the proposed facility, and <br />added cars, batteries, and tractors to the types of items to be accepted, and that some almost <br />certainly noisy processing would occur on site after all. <br />STATUS OF ISSUE: The zoning error by city staff was based on an incomplete knowledge of <br />the city's zoning ordinance. In many municipalities, when a new use is requested that is not <br />specifically identified on the list of land uses, city staff studies the functions, especially in <br />regards to issues such as traffic, noise, glare, stormwater, dust, etc. and plugs a use into a logical <br />category. Mr. Efrussy, with over 40 years of experience, has done this many times in other <br />jurisdictions. However, Paris's zoning ordinance, adopted in 1972, states that city staff has no <br />such authority. Instead, the matter should have been presented to the planning & zoning <br />commission for its review and recommendation, and then to the city council for assignment on <br />the list of land uses by resolution (which was subsequently done). <br />Unfortunately, based on Section 8 -109 of the zoning ordinance and the information initially <br />provided by the developers, the development staff determined the recycling center could be <br />allowed within Commercial and Light Industrial zoning districts, and failed to forward that <br />determination to the P &Z and council. In turn, the developer was issued a building permit in <br />error, which was subsequently revoked. All staff is very aware of the ordinance's restrictions, <br />and no letters regarding development rights (even if labeled "non- binding ") shall be provided to <br />any applicant or developer unless prepared and approved by the city attorney. <br />BUDGET: NA <br />RECOMMENDATION: Do not appoint a commission; we know what mistake was made, we <br />know how it was made, we know who made it, and we have corrected it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.