04/13/2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Council Meeting April 13, 2015 Page 2 decision making process, who made the decision and where the management oversight was because this could possibly lead to a financial liability and was an embarrassment to the City. Vic Ressler, 4020 Holbrook — he said it was his understanding the Glicks were appealing the revocation letter. He said it was also his understanding that State law, a Supreme Court ruling and the information on the City web -site limited their appeal process to administrative actions that were taken by City employees or City officials. He said in this case, that was not the case, that this item was voted on by the City Council and it was his understanding that same State law says the Board of Adjustment could not override a decision made by the Planning and Zoning or any of the elected officials. Mr. Ressler questioned why this was going to the Board of Adjustment and said he saw that they had no standing whatsoever, no jurisdiction over this question and he thought it was a mistake to let this go forward to that board. Mr. Ressler said if this goes forward and that board takes action on it, the City would have even bigger problems. Ed Ellis, 1015 SE 42'd Street — he said he served as the president of the Greater Paris Development Foundation. He said the foundation received the railroad corridor from the middle of Paris all the way to Clarksville, Texas' west city limits from a deed from Union Missouri Pacific Railroad back in 1996. Mr. Ellis said that was after a Federal Statute was passed allowing railroads to transfer ownership of their rails they were no longer using under the Rails to Trails Program. He also said the requirement was that those properties would follow the guidelines and in effect created trails along the guidelines and could not erect any permanent construction in the event the railroads wanted to bring back their rail lines. Mr. Ellis said some years ago the foundation did a lease with the City and the City was to maintain part of the trail. Mr. Ellis also said the trail between Collegiate and the loop was in bad need of repair and expressed concern about possible hazardous issues if something was not done quickly to improve it. He said the trail counter reflected there was up to 700 people a day using the trail. Mr. Ellis reported that the Lamar County Commissioners' Court approved an extension of the trail from Blossom all the way to the Red River County line. He also said the Red River County Commissioners' Court also approved an extension of the trail from the west boundary line of Red River County all the way to the City of Clarksville. On behalf of the foundation, Mr. Ellis requested that action be taken to maintain the trail. Greg Wilson, 3155 Clark Lane — he reiterated Mr. Ellis' comments about the trail and added that it would not be long before the NETTC would be very similar to the Katy Trail and that Paris should anticipate hundreds of thousands of people riding through the town when the trail was completed. He also said it was an asset and felt strongly that it needed to be maintained to the best of its ability. Mr. Wilson said it was the future for economic development through tourism and encouraged the Council to support maintenance of this portion of the trail. Jill Drake, 3605 Summerhill — she said she was an avid trail supporter. She reiterated Mr. Ellis and Mr. Wilson's comments and added the trail was in need of repairs for safety reasons.