My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2015 4:25:54 PM
Creation date
9/1/2015 2:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1802
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
X60 <br />Resolution 2004 -032, accepting the proposal of Freese and Nichols, Inc., for <br />professional services related to the performance of a Water System Vulnerability <br />Assessment pursuant to the requirements of the Public Health Security and <br />Bioterrorism Response Act, authorizing the execution of a Professional Service <br />Contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc., for such study, subject to the negotiation <br />of an acceptable fee, was presented. <br />Mayor Fendley asked if this was an expansion of the study by Freese and <br />Nichols, last month. Councilwoman Neeley remembered this was something the <br />Council voted to do in December that they had to spend money on. City <br />Engineer Napier agreed that it was another unfunded mandate. <br />Councilwoman Neeley questioned if this had not already been voted on. Mr. <br />Napier explained that the Council had voted to allow them to go out and get <br />proposals. He and Herb Campbell, Director of Utilities, looked them over and <br />selected Freese and Nichols as the best proposal because Freese and Nichols have <br />done the majority of Vulnerability Assessments throughout the State of Texas. <br />City Engineer Napier continued that there was a Vulnerability Self- Assessment <br />Test and they were going to get with Freese and Nichols to help them do this, <br />which is probably the most economical route. He indicated that Freese and <br />Nichols fee is Around $1.00 per population, which would make it between <br />$25,000.00 and $30,000.00, but they were going to try and negotiate and. get it <br />somewhere around $15,000.00. <br />Councilman Bell questioned if the other proposals were something they needed <br />to look at and if this was done by bid process. City Manager Malone explained <br />there is no going out for bids for professional services. Councilman Bell asked <br />if the Council authorizes this, then would the City negotiate the contract amount, <br />depending on what the City could afford and what needed to be done. City <br />Engineer Napier said that was correct. City Attorney Schenk explained this <br />resolution will authorize Mr. Napier to negotiate the fee and if he is not satisfied <br />.or is. not successful in negotiating a fee which is fair and reasonable, then he can <br />go to the next qualified company. <br />A motion was made by Councilman Guest to approve the resolution. It was <br />seconded by Councilwoman Neeley and carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.