My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2017 10:41:07 AM
Creation date
9/2/2015 3:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1895
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
493 <br />person is alive and not disabled, he can keep his job unless he does a willful <br />and serious misconduct act. <br />Mr. Waldrum said that an evaluation at the level of 1.5 to 2.4, needs <br />improvement, could continue for ten years and the City Council could not do <br />anything about it. If the official did not seek to improve, City Council could not <br />do anything about it as long as the official maintained a rating above a 1.5. Mr. <br />Waldrum pointed out that the contract has a mistake where it says, "the city <br />official fails to receive an average composite evaluation rating of 1.5." He said <br />he assumes the contract means in "excess of 1.5" because if the official did not <br />receive a 1.5 that is no good. This error needs to be corrected. <br />Mr. Waldrum asked that these contracts be looked at to see if this is what the <br />city really needs. He said the fact that so few people knew about them until <br />today is another reason why the City Council should be slow in making a <br />decision. <br />Councilman Bell said the committee was appointed in a city council meeting <br />approximately three months ago. The citizens did not pay attention to what was <br />happening. This is not the first time he has seen people come forward saying <br />that they did not know about something. He said nobody pays attention. This <br />is not the first time it has come up and it is not a real good argument. <br />Don Wilson, 3110 Stacy Lane, came forward telling the City Council that the <br />major reasons for his attendance tonight have been addressed. He said that <br />there has been major talk around town that there are employees in the city with <br />a substantial amount of comp time. Based on previous things that have been <br />said, the people might not have had all the information on this issue, but it is still <br />there and there are so many different comments about it that there is a question <br />whether "is there smoke here, or is there fire ?" Mr. Wilson advised that it has <br />been said that the City Manager has thousands and hundreds of thousands of <br />dollars of comp time built up. Mr. Wilson said you cannot take that lightly. He <br />said there was the Earl Smith situation and what was done in that situation was <br />done by the City Manager. Mr. Wilson directed his comments to Mr. Malone, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.