Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />January 23, 2012 <br />Page 5 <br />1450 <br />taking of a private property was in violation of the Texas Constitution, even though it was <br />dilapidated and a hazardous property. Unless an independent court that has never heard or seen <br />the case hears it and makes. a determination, the ruling would be in violation of the Texas <br />Constitution and Texas State Law. Mr. McIlyar clarified that he had never instructed the <br />Building and Standards Commission to stop conducting meetings or hearings, as the <br />Commission performed other functions that were beneficial to the City, other than issuance of <br />demolition orders. <br />Mr. McIlyar answered questions from City Council regarding filing suit in County and District <br />Courts, obtaining judgments against property owners and execution of same. Council Member <br />Pickle said he thought if the City got several judgments against property owners, he thought in <br />the future people would start taking care of their business. Council Member Frierson inquired if <br />these property owners were being fined for non - compliance. Mr. Anderson said he was not <br />aware of any fines being collected. Mr. Anderson said that the Committee appointed by the <br />Mayor was going to look at all of the issues and develop a plan. Council Member Pickle said he <br />would like to a see monthly report on the properties similar to the monthly ditch maintenance <br />report. <br />10. Mayor's Report on road improvements in the City of Paris. <br />Mayor Hashmi said he was allotted the task of road improvements and that he had a brief <br />report and suggestions. He said his objective was to educate everyone in future planning needs <br />of the City as related to roadways and infrastructure. He said a large amount of money must be <br />allocated for improvements, so it was doubtful they would be able to do everything at one time. <br />Mayor Hashmi said there was about 325 miles of roads in the City of Paris. He gave the history <br />of the roads being constructed first as dirt and gravel, later brick, then to concrete and finally <br />asphalt. He also said most of the infrastructure especially in the older parts of town was laid <br />under the roads and under dwellings with no concept of right -of -ways. Mayor Hashmi said to <br />progress it would require a systematic evaluation and analysis, specifically one needs to have <br />historical findings; look at the infrastructure as economic development; select products and lines <br />based on the economy; determine the timing to undertake and complete the objectives; <br />periodically review the progress and successes. He said from 1994 to 1998, money was <br />allocated for street overlay that was done from bond money and since then there had been no <br />allocation of funds for similar expenses. Mayor Hashmi said a more serious problem was the <br />rapidly deteriorating underground water and sewer pipes, some of which were put in place fifty, <br />sixty or even one - hundred years ago. He proposed that the City begin using a portion of the <br />economic development money each year for repair and replacement of infrastructure, because <br />without infrastructure there would be no economic development. Mayor Hashmi said <br />maintaining city streets included hot oil chip seal, emulsion type sealing and asphalt overlay. He <br />said the asphalt overlay was the best product, longest lasting, reduced traffic noise, lowest <br />maintenance cost, had the ability to take heavy loads and required no bidding, because it could <br />be included in the contract used by the County and TxDOT, but it was the most expensive, <br />required outside contractors and frequently required ground preparation. Mayor Hashmi said the <br />hot oil chip seal cost less, good for resurfacing as part of a regular maintenance program, it <br />sealed cracks on old roadways, roads could be opened rather quickly after application and <br />