My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19 - ZONING CHANGE
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2015
>
11 NOVEMBER
>
11/16/2015
>
19 - ZONING CHANGE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 9:50:26 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 12:43:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• "In order to ensure that multiple - family areas are designed to a high standard <br />whenever they develop in the future, the City should consider incorporating the <br />following guidelines into the Zoning Ordinance: <br />• The proposed multi - family tract should be adjacent to an arterial roadway; <br />• All structures within the multi - family development should be at least 90 percent <br />masonry on exterior of the first story; <br />• If the tract is adjacent to single - family residential dwellings, transition areas <br />(greenspace, buffer areas, medium density development, etc.) should be <br />incorporated into the property; and <br />• Based upon the density of the complex, an appropriate amount of useable open <br />space should be required." <br />It is true that the zoning ordinance has not yet been modified to include these recommendations. <br />However, city staff believes these adopted recommendations should be incorporated into all new <br />multi- family development. Except for possible access (in the future) to Lamar Avenue (an <br />Arterial Roadway), the applicant has made no indication that he will create the other multi- <br />family recommendations as stated above. <br />(d) Would likely undermine the integrity and tranquility of the existing single - family <br />development adjacent to, and west of, this subject property. <br />Option Three: Recommend approval of multi - family or apartment use, but only by approval of <br />the Multiple - Family Dwelling (MF -1) zoning district. <br />Pros: (a) Would permit multiple family uses, but would not allow most of the commercial, retail, <br />and many of the more intensive uses that are permitted in the GR zone. <br />Cons: (a) Introduces a zoning district that is currently not located within the immediate environs <br />of the subject property; <br />(b) Inconsistent with the FLUP. <br />(c) Could represent spot zoning. <br />Option Four: Recommend approval of multi - family or apartment use, but only by approving a <br />Planned Development Zoning District (PD). <br />Pros: (a) This would, if the applicant agreed, provide an implementable and legal basis for <br />including the recommendations for High- Density Residential (HDR) uses, as described in Ord. <br />2008 -016, and as stated above. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.