Laserfiche WebLink
Discuss and possibly take action on participation with the City in the development of hangars at Cox <br />Field: <br />Mr. Godwin gave a brief plan outline to build spec building/s at Cox Field Airport. Mr. Godwin stated the $1 M <br />Tx.Dot grant awarded to Cox Field was delayed until 2017. Mr. Banks asked if the proceeds from the sale of <br />property to Agpro could be used for development. Mr. Godwin stated affirmative, and that it may be earmarked <br />to match the TxDot grant. The Board was then addressed by Mr. Jerry Richie, Airport Manager and Mr. Dennis <br />Ashby of the Airport Board. Mr. Richie clarified the TxDot grant is to be used to build private lease hangars; <br />but the Airport would like to build industrial hangars also, such as a paint shop or airplane maintenance hangar. <br />Mr. Banks asked how many airplane paint shops were there near Paris. Mr. Richie stated there was one in Mena <br />Arkansas. Mr. Manning stated he would like to see a letter of intent before the PEDC stepped off into anything. <br />Mr. Dennis Ashby of the Airport Board stated he could advertise in trade magazines. Wilson pointed out there <br />was $10,000 dollars in the PEDC budget for marketing the Airport. Mr. Ashby stated the avionic shops could <br />employ up to 50 people. Mr. Manning stated more communication was needed. Mr. Brockman asked if it were <br />feasible for a building to be built unless there was a prospective tenant or a business agreement in place. Mr. <br />Manning asked if an avionic shop would be more practical to propose for the number of jobs. Mr. Brockman <br />proposed the PEDC partner with the Airport Board on advertising and after lengthy discussion on price per foot <br />and business prospects; Mr. Wilson suggested the Airport Advisory Board come back at a later date with a <br />viable advertising and or prospect for a build to suit building and or finance type arrangement that would create <br />jobs. The Board was in agreement. <br />Discuss and possibly take action on proposed downtown redevelopment proiect: <br />Mr. Godwin outlined a presentation of redevelopment of the downtown 1920's bank building by David J. <br />Alarid. Mr. Godwin stated that it may require an agreement between the City, the P.E.D.C. and the Developer. <br />Mr. Godwin stated those kinds of agreements were EDC statutes chapter 380 that covered this type of <br />agreement is legal and appropriate. Mr. Wilson asked how the P.E.D.C. could be involved in this if he would <br />require funding. Mr. Godwin responded that at some point the developer would be requesting assistance with <br />funding for infrastructure and or utilities. Mr. Wilson went on to say as much turmoil and anxiety that this <br />organization has created he did not think the P.E.D.C. Board should touch it. Mr. Godwin stated he understood. <br />Mr. Banks concurred. Mr. Manning thanked Mr. Godwin for his time and asked him to please keep the Board <br />informed. Mr. Brockman stated the Board was in favor of any development downtown. The Board was in <br />agreement. No action was taken. <br />Discuss and possibly act on recommendations by JC Darnell on our need for an indexed database and <br />storage: <br />Mr. Darnell presented two database storage options for the Board to consider. The first option included on site <br />storage but limited indexing capabilities. The second option offered cloud storage with more flexibility in <br />document searches and indexing. Cost for the cloud option was approximately $480 per user per year. Mr. <br />Wilson expressed reservations about document retrieval with the cloud based system. Mr. Darnell assured Mr. <br />Wilson it would be easier to retrieve in the cloud based service. Mr. Manning asked if this would work when the <br />PEDC had only a few days to submit a potential prospect proposal. Mr. Darnell stated it would give more <br />flexibility to search and retrieve information. Mr. Brockman asked about storage capacity & startup costs. Mr. <br />