My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17 - ELECTRICITY CONTRACT
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2016
>
02 FEBRUARY
>
02/22/2016
>
17 - ELECTRICITY CONTRACT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2016 12:32:44 PM
Creation date
2/19/2016 9:14:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TCAP's benefits regarding pricing <br />TCAP's membership consumes approximately 1.4 billion kWh annually which amounts <br />to approximately $100 million in revenue for the wholesale provider at current contract prices. <br />The value of the aggregated load is extremely appealing to wholesale market participants, <br />enabling TCAP to get the market competitive pricing at any particular moment. As reflected in <br />the third Whereas clause, in addition to the size of its load, TCAP derives benefit from <br />geographic diversity. TCAP members reside in all four ERCOT zones and are spread between <br />the entire length and breadth of Texas, from Wichita Falls to Harlingen and Fort Stockton to <br />Palestine. Since consumption is influenced by weather and since weather conditions are seldom <br />the same across all of Texas, it is unlikely that all TCAP members are reaching peak <br />consumption simultaneously. If the peaks of all TCAP members were totaled, the sum would <br />equal 313.1 MW. But a wholesale supplier looks at the peak consumption of TCAP as an <br />aggregated load rather than the sum of the peaks of all members. TCAP's peak demand is 246.9 <br />MW. That reduction in peak is a specific and unique benefit of aggregation. And unlike other <br />aggregation groups that accept counties and school districts as members, TCAP has focused its <br />membership on cities and other political subdivisions that have a relationship with cities to <br />maintain the very favorable load factor of cities with high off peak consumption from street <br />lights which provides favorable pricing terms. <br />History of CAPP, STAP, TCAP pricing <br />As reflected in the fifth and eighth Whereas clauses, aggregated cities have historically <br />been interested in flat, fixed -price, full- requirements contracts and price stability. The resolution <br />under consideration maintains that goal for a five -year period at a price much lower than the <br />current contract price. In 2002, CAPP and STAP were able to obtain prices for energy at 4 cents <br />per kWh. Very quickly after retail deregulation was implemented, natural gas prices started to <br />rise, and they continued on an upward trend until late 2008. In late 2008, CAPP cities were <br />paying approximately 13.5 cents per kWh. Fear that natural gas price volatility would continue <br />to result in high electricity rates, CAPP cities were excited to lock -in long term rates beginning <br />in 2009 that were significantly lower than prices experienced in the 2007 -2008 time frame. <br />STAP cities experienced their highest rate in 2006 at slightly more than 9 cents per kWh. STAP <br />cities saw prices drop to around 7.8 cents per kWh in 2008 and were happy to find a contract that <br />would stabilize prices in the 7 to 8 cent range for an extended period. When CAPP and STAP <br />members signed new contacts in late 2008, no one could have predicted that the economy was <br />about to enter a multi -year recession and that fracking would bring a glut of natural gas to a <br />market with reduced demand, putting natural gas and electricity prices into a downward trend. <br />Fortunately, gas prices have continued to drop and now TCAP members have an opportunity to <br />again capture rates in the range of, and hopefully below, 4 cents per kWh. <br />Contract Requirements <br />As explained in the tenth Whereas clause, there is no legal requirement that a city engage <br />in a competitive bidding process prior to contracting for electricity. The primary expectation of <br />contracting for wholesale energy in a deregulated energy market is that a purchaser sign a <br />contract accepting a particular offered price within 24 hours of receipt of the offer. NYMEX gas <br />futures prices change daily, and since gas prices drive electricity prices, it is unlikely that any <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.