Laserfiche WebLink
4. Code Enforcement Update <br />Ken Kohs — 332 & 334 Fitzhugh; buildings are gone, but pad is not smooth; cannot be <br />moved. Robert Talley — between property owner and contractor. <br />Sally McEwan — are we still getting our discount? <br />Robert Talley — no, flat rate $29 /ton. No one beats that price; was bid out. Previous <br />discount was because we had a back -log of properties at one time. <br />5. Discuss and act on information given to the commission. <br />How does back -tax information help determine whether or not to demo a property? <br />Johnny Norris asked for a hand vote if we need to know the back taxes. <br />Chad Lindsey asked to review what we consider to determine if something should be <br />repaired or demolished. <br />Stephanie Harris — BSC should determine condition of structures; does not see relevance <br />of taxes owed. Can property be reasonably repaired or should it be demolished? <br />Matt Allen — Should a person's financial means to repair be taken into consideration? <br />Stephanie Harris — The question is can the building be reasonably repaired? <br />Chad Lindsey — But it's the owner's responsibility to notify the committee that they're <br />not financially capable to make repairs. <br />Ken Kohls — Agreed outstanding taxes have no relevance on whether a building can be <br />repaired. <br />Committee unanimously agrees do not need tax information. <br />6. Future agenda items. <br />7. Adjournment <br />Motion was made by Johnny Norris, seconded by Ben Vaughan to adjourn the <br />meeting at 5:15. Motion carried unanimously. 7 -0 <br />APPROVED THIS 16'x' DAY OF MAY, 2016. 1" <br />)01; 4Chaiir4am' <br />