Loading...
11/08/2017 MINUTESCITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 107 EAST KAUFM�AN PARIS, TEXAS WEDVESD4AL-Y,0V-KMBEI2 S. 21D17 Present: Chris Dux, Chairinan Sarah Barbee Glee Eminite Linda Vandiver D-iniii Frazier, Coinmunitv Development Staff' Curia Easton, City Engineer Linda Knox, Council Liaison Chairman Dux called the meeting to order at 4:00p.m. Absent: David Alar Randv Hider Cheri Bed/brd, HPO Guests: A W Clem, Moore L,a iv Firm Cfaey,Gain, Moore Law Firm Stacy, Green, Coca-Cola Seniorl,eaderAip Teatn Brad A rcher, Smallwood Archer Construction The minutes of 0clober 23, 2017 were approved by acclamation. The Public hearing,/br consideration of action on the Certificate ofAroprialeness PP application for a demolition permit received by Coca-Cola Southwest Beverages, LLClbr the Structure designated as./ID-10, Part c?1'1033 Bonham Street, Children's I'ving Ql'the Old Sanitarium qfJoaris was declared' open 4-v Chairman.Dux A If' Clem, representing the Alloore Law Firm spoke on behalf ofCoca Cola Southvvest Beverages, LLC, fin, the demolition for the structure located on the back side of thepropert.y. Mr. Clem coqfirnred the commission had received the new COA submittals b " v C'oca Cola ivith the updated attachments. He began by explaining the current condition of the structure. 11c noted that the plant was.fin,7nerly used to bottle Coca- Cola, but novo this area is distribution center and utilized.f6r loading and servicing tiveky. He explained this - particular structure has become (in unsafe, and this concerns the compan,V, Ilefiv-ther explained nothing has been done with the structure.for years due to deteriorating conditions. He brought attention to the PoiwrPoinl shoiving the interior changesfivni hospital use to maintenance use, noting a lot of"interiorreniodeling took Palace at some point, leaving nothing of historical value relating to the children's hospital. Aloe,.forsafety saltie, the company, wants, the structure removed. He further explained that Coca-Cola is sensitive to thefiact that the entire property has historical signtficance; hovvever, there is nothing at all on the Bonharn Street (main road) that is even reminiscent (?f the fact that there ivas even a hospital on the site. Stacy v Green, Coca-Cola senior leadership representative addressed the commissioners, She explained that Coca-Cola has been a part of thejabric of Paris.fiv over I 12years as u bottling partner in the coinmunity and Coca-Cola strives to embrace and be supportive part ofthe community. The hospital structure has been the topic of many-, discussionsfionr the .senior leadership at Coca-Cola. She related that they aresYntpathefic to the ,structure and it sentimental value to the community. In an effbrt to b�e sensitive to history ol"Paris, they had an idea to put a memorial to the whole hospital infi-ont cif the current Coca -Colo facility, vvirich itself is a historic structure. She explained hoivever, the current structure had served no puipose.for inuytylllcurs, it is in a state of disrepair, has numerous leaks and the company" hasn't been able utilized the building in over 25 years. With the building removed, the company could leverage thespaelemore appropriatelY.1br the business. A. W, Clem stated that in talking with the contractor, who has looked (it the building in every aspect. It was his observation that tire only historicsignfflcance ivas the brick. Coca-Cola ivould be interested in salvaging enough q0hern, to build a memorial structure to highlight not only the children's wing, but also acknott'ledge thefbi-ii,iets(,initai-iuirr. Coca-Cola ivould look to the commission to help design the memorial and its content. Xo other person spoke for or against the demolition of the structure. Commissioner Dux commended Coca-Colaforhaving the insight and ivillingness to construct an inteilvetive marker to recognize the histoi3, of the site and the building. He asked if they knew who theYplanned on working with to develop the content on the plaques, Mr. Gent stated that the, contractor who will be ;vorking oil, the demolition will also be helping construct the monument. Commissioner Dux said theY might want to consult with Skij)pei'Sleely-, with the Lamar County Histork.wl Museum, located behind MeCoca-Cola property. Hearing no other comments, the public hearing was then closed; Commissioner Dux asked if the conunission had arty other question concerning the Certificate: of Appropriateness. Conunissioner Ennnite asked if the monuinent design would be coming back to the commission, and Mr. A, H' Clem said yes, they would be looking to the commission for content, Commissioner Ennnite made the motion that the demolition order be approved, seconded by Commissioner Mandiver, motion carried 4-0. Discussion on Certafieate o,I'Al)l)i-ol.)i-i(iteness,fer?-.15 SE I" Street, Lickety Split Wine Bar, Fence., No applicant was present, so Commissioner Dux recommended the commission neither approve nor deny an.),, applications until (in applicant is present. A motion ivas made to table the application request /�y Commissioner Vandiver, seconded by Commissioner Emmil.e, motion carried. Commissioner lux stated that he did have some questions about 1heproject. Carla Easton, the City Engineer explained the city Tvas working with Ms. Beavers, and addressed the commissioner "s" questions noting some of them ware a that did not involve the citY. Coiyitni.v,yioiie),Dux aiidColiiiiii's,vt'onei, Vandiver hada question about the amended application, egress, and permissionfi-om the Fire Marshall./or safety. Als. Easton clarafled some ref the easement details, and explained how- it was worked out benveen the propert), owners. Shefhrther e.ylained ono, reason the'limcing came to the historic preservation commission for review was because of the waY the fences was attached to the buildings. Otherwise it would have been approved in house. Thecommission discussed setting some goals for public outreach and education aimed at property owners with historic, homes and buildings, within the historic! districts. Chairman Dux suggested instead of running into problems with people not knowing what can and cannot be done in the district, outreach of what the rules are and the reason for the rule might help. He noted there should be some positive outreach tocontractors, realtors', building owners too. He asked 4',Ihere were an ' y ideas jrom the commission. Ms. Easton talked about the Community Development department is under the same serutiyq as the commission and there ' 'Y is an ongoing outreach campaign going ng onto help to educate the public, She mentioned the City of Paris used Facebook as a tool to blast out the information. Size had also arranged a stakeholders meeting about the permitting process, hoping to have a good dialogue with them to see if'thev can come up i,vith ideas on wvhat could be improved on the Citj) standpoint. Commissioner Dux also talked about aproperty tour with information and Commissioner Enimile mentioned Presen,ation month in Mqv might be a good time to try to do a property tour and she would visit with the Main Street Advisoiy board about a partnership. Consent agenda It was determined that the structures are not eligible to he designated on the National Register of Historic Places, as a recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or as historic property (is designated b'Y the City Council ref the Ci(v Qf Paris. Commissioner Barbee made the motion to take no opposition to the recommendations from the Code inspectors on the properties 1000 NE 3"'Street & 603 6"' AT HPO ivus not present to give report but the following was presented in the agenda items with additional notes: CLIA 4 2017-33dosiah Daniel, ll I Lamar Ave, October 12, 2017 APPROVED PYORK: Paint store font with approved Historic Colors (Shempin Williams Historic Color Palette) SW2844, STY2819, SW2826 COA # 20,17-32 Pat Conrad, 120 W Bonham, October 17, 2017 APPROVED TVORK: Paint front door with Beni(iininA4o�)Y-(�HC-169C,'ot,entr- Gray A motion to (Vourn wasmade bh CommissionerBarhee, seconded b Commissioner Emmite, motion carried, Aleeth ende, at 4:40 Ap oveI of 2017 Chaimian