11 - City's Comprehensive Plan UpdateItem No. 11
s
TO: Mayor & City Council
John Godwin, City Manager
FROM: Alan Efrussy, AICP, City Planning Manager
SUBJECT: DEFINITION AND FUNCTIONS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATE: June 18, 2018
BACKGROUND: There are many growth—management tools that a municipality can implement
to direct and control its physical development. One of the most important is the comprehensive
plan. There are two major reasons why this mechanism is essential to aid a city's growth—
management program. First, the comprehensive plan is the primary document that can
collectively coordinate a number of physical development plans, such as parks, future land use,
thoroughfares, etc. This coordination could help a city avoid duplication of effort and cost
regarding its physical development. Second, the comprehensive plan has historically been the
major document that describes a city's long—term vision for physical development, which is
typically from five to 30 years, or even longer.
STATUS OF ISSUE: The city staff has made the following findings:
(A) Definition of a Comprehensive Plan: The essential definition of a comprehensive plan is that
it is a long—range plan intended to direct the growth and physical development of a
community for a 20 to 30 year or longer period.
(B) History of Comprehensive Planning. in Paris: Paris is one of the small percentage of
American cities which have a history of comprehensive planning going back over one
hundred years. Records indicate that comprehensive plans were prepared for Paris in 1915,
1966, 1981, 2001, and the Future Land Use Plan Map and the Plan Map Legend Explanations
were updated in 2008.
(C) The Current Role-ofComl rehensiveww,Planning, in Paris: Standard city planning practice
recommends that a city's comprehensive plan be reviewed annually, and updated as
necessary, which is oftentimes every three to five years (or sooner, based on changing
physical or economic conditions). Therefore, at this time the city staff believes it is
appropriate to update the current plan; the staff is now preparing a modified 2018 update to
the current officially adopted 2001 Comprehensive Plan. In that regard, the staff believes the
following information is highly relevant:
1) The 2001 Paris Comprehensive Plan is strongly recommended not to be rescinded
since much still remains very relevant for Paris. Therefore, staff is recommending,
where still relevant and feasible, that the 2001 plan be used in conjunction with the
2018 update. Also note that the 2001 plan is still the official and adopted
Comprehensive Plan for Paris, and that the 2008 update did not rescind said 2001
plan.
2) In relation to paragraph 1) above, however, the 2018 plan update will recommend that
the updated Future Land Use Plan, Park Plan, and the Major Thoroughfare Plan be
implemented upon the 2018 Plan adoption, and therefore these particular components
of the 2001 Plan be rescinded.
It is noted that historically, while a comprehensive plan should typically include a
range and discussion of well—accepted city planning principles and practice,
nonetheless the future land use plan, major thoroughfare plan, and the park, recreation
and open space plans are consulted much more often than any other components in a
comprehensive plan. However, in addition, there are important city planning
principals and practice recommendations included in the 2018 Plan update.
3) An historical and fundamental principle in city planning is that short—range decisions
(e.g. zonings, site plans, etc.) should always be evaluated against the long-range
vision of a city (i.e., especially through the future land use plan). The Paris city staff
strongly emphasizes this practice, otherwise why have a long—range future land use
plan? The critical reason for advancing this is that the comprehensive plan and future
land use plans evaluate and impact the long—range physical development vision for
the entire city, and a zoning decision mainly evaluates and impacts a much smaller
area. A larger perspective, therefore, will aid in the potential for more efficient, more
aesthetic, more cost—effective, and more functional development of a city.
4) At the July 9a` Council meeting, staff will discuss a PowerPoint presentation that will
further amplify the functions of a comprehensive plan as already stated herein.
BUDGET: Minimal or no cost to the city, since the plan update will be done in-house.
RECOMMENDATION: Observe the PowerPoint presentation made in conjunction with this
agenda item memorandum, make any comments and ask any questions you so desire, and
2
support the staff in the preparation and implementation of the Paris 2018 Comprehensive Plan
Update project.